Reviving the Influence of Indian Arts, Crafts and Design

Introduction

The history of India is marked by many centuries where Indian arts crafts and design were highly sought after globally. With over 3,000 unique arts and crafts, the importance of the arts in Indian society as well as its popularity in the ancient world is a testament to the fine workmanship and aesthetics of the Indian craftsman. India has an ancient and unique art history, with every region excelling in an art form. Usually the expertise is passed down from family members creating communities of artisans, these crafts are all of local provenance and are still found in their original forms.

Indian craftsmanship is also a prime example of the syncretic culture in India, with aesthetic influences from various religions like Hinduism, Jain, Buddhist, Sikh, Islamic as well as unique tribal aesthetics. The world has influenced Indian crafts and India has in return influenced world aesthetics. This ancient bond has not sustained itself for thousands of years merely by chance but simply by the commitment of the Indian craftsmen to their expertise. For the Indian craftsman his work has always been more than just a form of employment, there has always been a deep sacredness and spirituality accorded by the craftsman towards his products.

Unfortunately, with the advent of industrialization from the mid 18th to early 19th century, cheaper forms of crafts based on industrial labour replaced the craftsmanship of the karigar. This shift was a substantial setback to the Indian craftsmen and these special stories were forgotten. Today, many artisans struggle for survival and their unique crafts remain endangered. With the lack of product design, modern marketing techniques and political will various forms of Indian arts and crafts are becoming redundant, but the resilient Indian karigarcontinues to be the crucible of India’s culture.

In the international markets, there remains a strong appreciation for Indian artisanal goods. Earth friendly in nature, Indian crafts are the need of the hour and Indian karigars are infusing these crafts with modern design influences to suit new markets and sensibilities. Each of these crafts are unique to the cultures that have influenced them as well as the region, just as are the individual producers or the communities they represent. However, the karigarswill to adapt to modern markets, his resilience as well as the uniqueness of his craft has still not been enough to elevate the arts, crafts and design industry to its former glory. Therefore, it is important to comprehend the limitations faced by karigars trading internationally as well as in the local market. India from once being an influencer of arts and design on a global scale and having dominated the world market for centuries, today has to find solutions to optimise trade and influence of these crafts.

 

History of international trade and the subsequent decline

A global international trade outlook for India is not a new perspective. The complex but well organised system of international trade between ancient India and the rest of the world is fairly well documented. There were structures for trade and linkages to institutions, artists and patrons. These interactions and linkages all played a role in the Indianization of world culture and positioning India as an influential Soft Power globally.

The Indus valley civilization (3000 BCE -1700 BCE) had a rich craft tradition as well as a high degree of technical excellence in the art of pottery making, metal and terracotta, jewellery weaving etc. The craftsmen not only created all the local needed items but surplus items also.1 Indus Valley sites like Lothal were busy ports and these products were highly coveted in countries like Egypt and Mesopotamia.

During the Vedic age too (1500 BCE) the rise of religious literature also created a market for the use of religious objects like pots made of wood, clay and metal. The Vedas themselves spoke of artists, craftsman and products that had gained popularity.

The Mauryan Empire (322 BCE- 185 BCE) also has some surviving remnants of its Buddhist influence in the form of stupas that were patronized by Ashoka. These were prime example of the mature design sensibilities of the ancient age. In the far north-west of India (modern Afghanistan and Pakistan) Greco-Buddhist fusion art developed (1 CE – 500 CE) and by the Gupta period (320 CE – 550 CE) Indian art represented by all major religions of the time reached its peak. In the south of India as well the Chola, Chera, Pandya Tamil dynasties all patronized regional arts, crafts and design and were known for their sculptures and fresco paintings.

Trade of elegant and highly refined Indian textiles not just in India but internationally too can be gauged by the antiquity of Indian textile exports. The first century Greek source Periplus, mentions the Gujarati port of Barygaza, (Broach) as exporting a variety of textiles, dyes and ivory. Roman writer Pliny (CE 23-79) complained of the cost of luxury commodities imported to Europe from India. India known for its fine muslin and cotton (called “woven air” in roman literature) ivory, aromatics were in high demand world over amongst many other artisanal products”.2 Pliny stated “Not a year passed in which India did not take fifty million sesterces away from Rome”.3 “One of the Roman Senators, while decrying the import of fine cotton muslin of India to satisfy the variety of Roman women, said that in doing so the Empire’s coffers had been emptied”.4

Textiles from India were also in demand in Egypt, East Africa, and the Mediterranean between the 1st and 2nd centuries CE, and these regions became overseas markets for Indian exports.5 “There was export of printed fabric to China by the 4th century, 13th Century Chinese traveller Chau Ju- Kua commented on the variety of Indian textiles in Gujarat and their export to the Arab Countries, Marco Polo also mentioned the export of Indian textiles to South East Asia, Chou Ta-kuan, the Chinese observer of life at the Khmer capital of Angkor at the end of the thirteenth century, wrote that preference was given to the Indian weaving for its skill and delicacy. Prestige textiles like the Patola also had a great impact in some south Asian countries like Malaysia and Philippines where they were aspirational fashion limited only to the royal family members”.6

Goods exported from India was not only at the fore front of fashion but were prized for their unparalleled craftsmanship. These goods connected the world to Indian culture and influenced not just its aesthetics but also played a major role in the “indianization” of some civilizations. India had always been global soft power until the 18th Century.

The Colonial period in India also brought in its own western influence as well as European patrons. Indian calicoes and muslin became vital to the Portuguese, Dutch, British and Danish East India Companies. The Chintz became the axis of all textile trade. Later, even artists were influenced by the western style of painting like Raja Ravi Varma. Fusion of the European romanticized style with Indian influences evident in many art works of the era displaying The Tree of Life or Indian hunting scenes with elephants and tigers.

Unfortunately, this time of aesthetic collaboration and trade came to an abrupt halt. The Industrial Revolution in Europe made a significant difference to the development of India’s Arts and Crafts.  With new industries in England that produced textiles and goods faster and cheaper, the Indian cottage industry was left severely impacted. The British levied heavy taxes and duties on Indian imports making them far more expensive than the European counterparts. In 1721 the East India company was banned from importing Indian goods. In addition to this setback the disappearance of India’s royal houses that were some of the primary patrons of regional arts, crafts and design, left Indian karigarswithout patrons. This not only effected their creative focus but also left them without resources to experiment with new designs and techniques.

The artisanal value of these Indian goods also became less important to the buyer in contrast to industry manufactured goods. On the contrary the Indian markets were flooded with British made goods for the first time further damaging the Indian market.

The continued fall of sales of Indian goods as well as the lack of patrons, karigars that had historically passed their art down to the next generation started encouraging their families to take up alternate more profitable trades. Not only did the influence of India globally decline but also production of Indian arts and crafts in India slowed down.

Increasing relevance and the way forward

The story of Indian arts, crafts and design is as old as the land itself. The confluence of religion and culture in India’s sculptures, paintings, earthenware and textiles remain unparalleled. It is this very synchronicity that makes Indian crafts unique and invaluable. While India has at times shared its aesthetics with other parts of the world, she has at the same time incorporated foreign design and aesthetics from other countries into its crafts. For instance, Batik and Ikat textiles were created for Africa and South Asian countries. This was possible due to maritime trade of the time, the route that the Indian Ocean provided for traders, the amicable relationship shared with other cultures, and the deep understanding of the craftsman towards the ever changing demands of the market.

Today, once again global leaders are largely moving towards greater cooperation and collaboration. The days of colonial domination is a thing of the past even while leaving some scars that still need healing. However, the resilience of the Indian craftsman and his commitment and sacredness towards his craft has carried Indian arts, crafts and design into the 21st century. It is this essential nature of the proud Indian craftsman and his sacred processes of creating India’s arts crafts and design that touches the human heart and mind, and this is the essence of what should to be translated into the soft power of a nation.

The crafts sector is the only industry that keeps the importance of human interaction alive in an increasingly machine oriented world. It relies on human contact at every step and that is what has maintained its relevance and uniqueness in the modern world.

Cottage Industry in India had grown organi-cally since the birth of the Indian civilisation. The power it has yielded has impacted entire communi-ties. It not only has absorbed workers from both genders, women and men both have equal standing within this industry but it also has also provided a skill that can generate income.

With the importance of climate change and the need of the hour being Earth friendly products, the time for Indian arts, crafts and design to take centre stage has arrived. Most products in the markets today are not earth friendly. Indian artisanal products are completely biodegradable, recyclable and renewable. These products are also economically cost effective in the long run. The ethical approach to fulfilling consumer demands requires us to switch to artisanal products.

With the entry of global online stores there is immense possibility to aid the revival of Indian arts, crafts and design. It will not only encourage karigars to become more technologically savvy but also allow the very last karigar to access a global market. It will enable him to cater directly to the online customer eliminating the need of a middleman. However, there is also a necessity for the government to dispense information and not only online marketplace training directly to the karigar but also to ensure awareness to individual craftsman of standards, rules and regulations for export. Considering that employment generation by the handicrafts sector has been growing at about 6-7 per cent each year and has increased from less than 60 lakh in 2008-09 to over 70 lakh in 2011-12, it calls for developing a mechanism to enable rural and semi-urban entrepreneurs to take advantage of emerging market opportunities.7

It is equally important alongside the promo-tion of online trade to keep alive the ‘bazaar’. The Indian bazaar has always been the social, economic and cultural heart of India. This is where human interaction, ideas and cultural religious exchanges take place. Most importantly the touch and feel quality of Indian crafts come to life. The bazaar is an integral part of the Indian culture and its preservation a necessity in a technology driven world. The impact of arts, crafts and design in India does not just limit itself to preserving the trade but it also mobilizes culture.

Access to urban and commercial spaces, exhibitions and fairs curated to global standards, generating interest worldwide through associations and fostering community enterprises will all aid the global positioning of Indian arts, crafts and design.

Few heritage villages are already successful models representing the community spirit of the craftsman, and more are being created to draw in visitors to witness not just the creation of products but also the cultural milieu. For instance, the heritage village of Raghurajpur in Odisha attracts tourism where people come to stay with the karigars, some to learn their crafts and some to imbibe the culture. The village fosters the spirit of the karigar and tradition of Indian arts, crafts and design. The promotion of heritage villages like Raghurajpur also creates access for patrons and consumers both nationally and internationally to recognise the value of the Indiankarigar.

In a study titled “Infusing vibrancy into Indian handicraft sector” conducted by The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry in India (ASSOCHAM), it is stated that the share of handicraft exports in India’s total exports has significantly declined over the years. From about four percent in 2001- 02 it has fallen to just under one percent in 2011-12.8 The possibility of decline in handicraft exports may also be due to the fact that over 60% of the exports are to the West whereas other potential buyer regions like South East Asia and Africa have been overlooked. Therefore, unfortunately India’s share in the international handicraft market is not nearly as formidable as it should be.

There is an immediate need to upgrade the handicraft industry knowledge base. Most small craftsmen are not aware of standards, rules and regulations for export.

There is also a huge gap in understanding product design and modern needs. Age old techniques can be applied to creating modern products as per market requirement. There is also a necessity for the government to dispense information and online marketplace training directly to the artisan.

With the entry of global online stores there is immense possibility to revive dying arts and to encourage artisans to become more technologically savvy, enabling artisans to cater directly to the online customer. Besides, considering that employment generation by handicrafts sector has been growing at about 6-7 per cent each year, it calls for developing a mechanism to enable rural and semi-urban entrepreneurs to take advantage of emerging market opportunities.9

The economic focus of the artisan has to change from just subsistence to growth and success. The impact of art in India is not just limited to preserving the trade but also mobilizing culture. Through access to urban and commercial spaces, promotion of exhibitions and fairs curated to global standards, generating interest worldwide through associations and fostering community enterprises we may be able to promote and preserve the richness of Indian arts, crafts and design.

In the international market, there remains a deep appreciation for Indian artisanal goods and India has begun to realise the immense Soft Power potential of bringing back to the world its philosophical, spiritual, artistic, and aesthetic capabilities and is ready to share it with the world. The success of Indian arts, crafts and design is not the sole responsibility of the karigaror of the government. This is a collective responsibility and with the Indian artisan already reinventing himself his success does not seem distant.

References:

Bibliography

  1. http://blog.bhavishyanet.org/2018/06/07/69/
  2. http://jigyasa0.tripod.com/trade.html
  3. http://jigyasa0.tripod.com/trade.html
  4. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/187505/7/07_chapter%201.pdf
  5. Shaffer, Lynda N. (2001), “Southernization”, Agricultural and Pastoral Societies in Ancient and Classical History edited by Michael Adas, Temple University Press, ISBN 1-56639-832-0.)
  6. http://jameelcentre.ashmolean.org/collection/7/10236/10333
  7. https://www.businessstandard.com/search?type=news&q=exports
  8. https://www.businessstandard.com/search?type=news&q=exports
  9. http://assocham.org/newsdetail.php?id=5051
  10. Kanika,B http://www.historydiscussion.net/history-of-india/vedic- period/trade-and-commerce-during-the-vedic-period-india-history/7060)
  11. Dhamija, 1992; p.5Dhamija, J (1992), ‘Indian Folk Arts and Crafts’, National Book Trust, India, New Delhi.
  12. Gadgil, DJR (1985), J’The Industrial Evolution of India in Recent Times’, 1860-1939 (Fifth Edition, Seventh Impression), Oxford University Press, New Delhi. )
  13. Donkin, Robin A. (2003), Between East and West: The Moluccas and the Traffic in Spices Up to the Arrival of Europeans, Diane Publishing Company, ISBN 0-87169-248-1.

(Ms. Rami Desai is the Director of iSTRAT CA, a company that deals in research,
communication and data management and skill development. Views expressed are personal.)

(This article is carried in the print edition of March-April 2019 issue of India Foundation Journal.)

 

 

Breaking Box Offices: Indian Cinema as Soft Power

A hundred and five years ago, India was dazzled by Raja Harishchandra, the first Indian feature film that told a story from the Mahabharata (Massey, 1974). Eighteen years later in 1931, Ardeshir Irani directed the first Indian sound film Alam Ara (Beauty of the World) that was a turning point for the Indian film industry. The “talkies” created stars out of actors for the young to idolize, spawned the creation of regional cinema – Bengali, Tamil and Telugu talkies were made within a few months of Alam Ara’s release – and created the glamour that we now associate the industry with.

Bollywood, a portmanteau of Bombay and Hollywood, entered common parlance in the 1990s and is often used as an umbrella term to refer to the Indian film industry. Yet, in the year 2015-16 regional language cinema accounted for 82.18% of films produced in India, with Tamil producing 15.30%, followed by Telugu 14.50%, Kannada 10.73%, Marathi 9.46% and Malayalam 8.83% (Central Board of Film Certification, 2016)1. Hindi movies account for roughly 18% of all films produced in India. Each of these industries, boasts of a following abroad and contributes to Indian soft power, although undoubtedly, Hindi movie stars and films dominate the space.

Indian cinema has huge audiences from across the world including Africa, the Middle East, North and South America, Europe, Central Asia and Australia, and appeals to audiences beyond the Indian diaspora. For instance, Shahrukh Khan and Katrina Kaif performed at the coronation of Bhutanese King Jigme KhesarNamgyel Wangchuk, a known fan of Bollywood, in 2008 (Roy, 2012), and Chinese President Xi Jinping is said to have watched and “liked” Dangal (Press Trust of India, 2017). Michelle Obama while in office danced to the tunes of Bollywood songs (Sridharan, 2013) and Myanmar’s Aung San Suu Kyi once commented that “we all love to watch Hindi movies” (Roy, 2012).

Indian films have transcended language and regional barriers, gained acceptance across populations and developed a cult audience as it travelled beyond its own borders. Indian movies are unique for their amalgamation of dance, drama, music and poetry, drawing from ancient Indian theatre traditions such as Kerala’s Kathakali, Tamil Nadu’s Terukuttu and Maharashtra’s Thamasha. While often ridiculed among scholars and critiques for being overdramatic and escapist – a more pertinent question is, what is intrinsically wrong with escapism? Some of Hollywood’s most successful movies are escapist – the Star Wars series, The Avengers, and Guardians of the Galaxy, the list could go on. Movies can act as a good source of entertainment and allow audiences to go on a short (and cheap) three-hour holiday. Nevertheless, the critique does not always hold true, for India has produced a good mix of masala2and “intellectual” or serious films.

Mother India, a hugely popular film, spoke of dignity of labour and that of the individual (Ahmed, 1992), a topic which resonated with audiences in the African continent, Southeast Asia and the Middle East (Mishra, 1989). Channel 4 aired it on British television “as part of its highly successful season of Indian cinema” (Mishra, 1989), it was nominated for an Oscar in 1958, and it is said that the movie continued to sell out even a decade after its first screening in Nigeria (Larkin, 1992). Satyajit Ray’s PatherPanchalitraces the life of a poor, rural Bengali family while subtly exploring the tense relationship between rural-urban and the ongoing changes brought by technology – electricity and a railway line – a theme that resonated with audiences across the world. When Ray’s PatherPanchalipremiered at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, little did he know that he would dispel “the long-held feeling that India was unlikely to produce a great film” (Massey, 1974). The movie was so popular that it went on to win the Best Human Documentary award at the 1956 Cannes Film Festival, is the only Indian movie to be featured in BBCs Top 100 foreign movies ever made, and was described as having “introduced Indian cinema to the West as cataclysmically as Kurosawa’s Rashomon had done for Japanese films (Cherian, 2016).

What makes Indian cinema popular?

The growth of Indian cinema abroad between the 1950s and 1980s was exemplary. A large part of its success could be attributed to the Indian diaspora who were widely travelled and had settled in many parts of the world. Although the first Indian movie, Sant Tukaram, a Marathi film,had won its international award, prior to Indian independence in 1937 at Venice, it was the Indian diaspora that introduced the movies to the general public.They brought with them cassettes, Bollywood posters and other movie paraphernalia, presenting India’s colourful movies for locals to consume. In these three decades India produced multiple hits, notable among them Awara, Mera Naam Joker, Sholay, Pardesiand Disco Dancer, many of which remain popular even today3. Mirroring this development, India too has produced movies – America Alludu(1985), Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenga (1995), Hyderabad Blues (1998), Hum Tum (2004), Swades (2004), Namaste London (2007), Kabali(2016) – that dealt with diaspora emotions, the longing to return to the homeland and similar themes that resonated with the diaspora, were instantly successful.

In Tanzania the first permanent theatres were Bharat and Krishna Cinemas that opened in the Indian quarters. It was quickly followed by the opening of the “major theatre”, Empire Cinemas, by HassanaliAdamaliJariwalla, a wealthy Indian entrepreneur, who “pioneered the first cinemas” in Tanzania and Zanzibar and screened Indian movies on the prime days of Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays (Brennan, 2005). In South Africa Bollywood movies are released every week in multiplexes across the country (Barlet, 2010). In the Netherlands, Indian movies are “very popular” among Surinamese Hindustanis (Oonk, 2007) who also helped in propagating the cinemas, most visible in The Hague (Verstappen & Rutten, 2007). Dutch theatres screen Indian movies regularly and since 2001, NPS, the official Dutch broadcasting network has been showing Indian films, mostly on Sundays which has helped reach a wider audience (Verstappen & Rutten, 2007).

Conversely, Indian cinema is prevalent in countries like Senegal, Nigeria, Russia, Japan and Peru, who do not have a sizeable Indian diaspora. In Senegal for example, Indian movies were introduced in 1953 with the release of Aan, and has gained cult status ever since (Steene, 2012). No wonder it came as no surprise to many when Akon, a Senegalese, sang ChamakChalo in Hindi for the movie Ra. One. Similar is the experience in Nigeria, one of India’s most successful export markets, where Indian cinema has permeated most households through theatres, DVDs, dedicated Bollywood television and radio channels, and dance clubs. The influence of Bollywood is most visible in Nollywood spin-off movies, local dance and Bollywood inspired Nigerian literature, soyyaya(Luedi, 2018). The Nollywood film ZeeWorld Madness (2017), that pokes fun at Nigeria’s obsession with ‘ZeeWorld Bollywood’, the channel that plays Indian cinema on television, is a testimony of Indian soft power. Telugu “power star”, Pawan Kalyan is admired as much in South India as in Poland, Rajinikanth’s Muthu (1998) ran for 23 weeks in Japan (Aiyar, 2017) and resulted in tremendous fascination for India visible today in the number of South Indian restaurants and “Rajini” fan clubs. The Telugu-Tamil-Malayalam movie, Mahanatiwas widely received in the North America despite little advertising. Moreover, online sources such as Netflix, Amazon Prime and HotStar have helped reach non-traditional audiences, most evident in the success of Sacred Games.

No paper on cinema as India’s soft power is complete without a mention of the roaring success of Aamir Khan’s Dangal, especially in China, a country where Indian movies had not enjoyed a breakthrough, and S.S Rajamouli’sBaahubali, across the world. Rob Cain, the film and television director, describes the two movies in Forbes as a “one-two punch” that “knocked out” everybody’s expectations (Cain, 2017). Baahubali opened in over 10,000 screens worldwide, ran for over 100 days in Japan and “shattered all previously held box-office records” for an Indian film in North America (India Today, 2018). The protagonist, Prabhas, was described as “a presence grand enough to transcend language” (Tsering, 2015), evident in its worldwide success. Dangal on the other hand, which released as Let’s Wrestle, Dad!, topped every movie in China except for Transformers: The Last Knight and earned $152 million (Cain, 2017). The success of these movies in the Chinese market is significant as it not only remained a closed market for Indian cinema but also restricts the entry and screening of foreign films through stringent quotas. Yet, other Indian films too captured the Chinese market such as Aamir Khan’s Secret Superstar and P.K, and Salman Khan’s BajrangiBhaijan.It is clear Aamir Khan remains a potent Indian soft power in the Chinese market with his massive following and potential to influence a young, growing audience.

What explains the popularity of Indian films abroad, despite some countries restricting the entry of these movies through quotas? Factors like the cast, certification, timing of release, number of screen playing the movie, symbolic meaning of the movie, format of release, and perception of India by the movie’s foreign consumers, and the movie’s success in the home market determine the success of India cinema abroad (Hennig-Thurau, Walsh, & Bode, 2004). The relation India shares with the foreign country also greatly determines the entry and consequently the success of the movie. Nevertheless, most of these factors are common to most movies that enter any foreign market. Therefore, it is perhaps India’s cultural proximity that it shares with its neighbourhood and beyond that allows these films to engage with an audience in ways that Hollywood movies cannot. Moreover, the movies that have done well in foreign markets revolved around family, caste and religion barriers, conservative societies, morality, struggle, honour and family name, experiences which are also central to these countries. Indian movies are looked at as “decent” and allow the audience to be modern without being western, emphasize community oriented values rather than individualism than resonates with audiences in Asia, Africa and South America.

Cross-productions and influence on local cinema markets

Following the success of Indian movies in foreign markets, there has been an increased interest in cross border co-productions and India centric location shooting. One of the most popular of such films was a Soviet co-production Alibaba aur 40 Chor(1980) that starred Dharmendra, Hema Malini and Zeenat Aman from the Indian side (Salazkina, 2010) 4. Equally popular was Raj Kapoor’s My Name is Joker (1970) that starred Soviet actors. In 2009 a major Hollywood studio, Warner Bros., entered India with its co-production Chandni Chowk to China (2009). Although the film failed to deliver in North America, interest from Hollywood continued and was soon followed by Sony’s co-production of Saawariya, Fox Studio’s Slumdog Millionaire, UTV Motion Pictures’ Chennai Express and Walt Disney Pictures’ P.K. Hollywood’s Nightfall and Crocodile 2 were shot and edited entirely in Ramoji Film City, the world’s largest film studio complex, opening the doors for other foreign films. Mainstream successful movies like The Jungle Book, Octopussy from the James Bond series, The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, Eat Pray Love, The Darjeeling Limited and Dark Knight Rises were either partially or fully shot in India.

It is of interest to note the influence Indian movies had on local directors. Melodrama as a narrative technique and other Indian cinematic attributes – centred on family, gender roles and emotional stories – were adapted by Malaysian directors to great degree, with many films having “more in common” with Devdasand Shree than Hollywood movies (Heide, 2002). Malaysian directors like P. Ramlee were greatly influenced by South Indian films and it is said that in the 1960s Malaysia, Malay moviegoers “started to prefer the Hindi-language” films which “were flooding the local cinemas” (Yusoff, 2013). King Ratnam, a Sri Lankan filmmaker debuted with Komaali Kings, a film that tells the story of the Tamilian population in his country. In Malaysia, Shanjhey Kumar Perumal’s Jagat, a Malaysian movie made in Tamil, was an instant award-winning hit. The Hollywood movie Divorce Invitation (2012) was in fact inspired by a 1997 Telugu movie, Aahwaanam. Even in Brazil, the directors of the 2009 television show India: A Love Story,that boasted of over 30 million viewers in the South American nation, drew their inspiration from India.

The influence of Indian cinema as a soft power is best appreciated when this admiration for Indian movie stars, films and shooting styles generates a ripple effect in other sectors. The movies create an interest in India among viewers who in turn desire to consume all things Indian. Gaining traction abroad for instance are Indian inspired weddings with song and dance or Indian “exotic” locations, Bollywood themed night clubs and restaurants, the creation of the Brazilian board game – The Bollywood Game, and an increase in Indian tourism. Furthering Indian soft power are also actors like Priyanka Chopra who have now become a household name abroad, especially in North America. When mainstream primetime television shows like The Big Bang Theory or The Mindy Kaling Show include an Indian character as a protagonist it goes a long way in furthering Indian soft power. The effect of this influence can be reversed too – take for example the wooing of Indian film stars and directors by foreign governments to shoot in their country to boost tourism from India.

It is clear that Indian cinema was global even before “globalisation”. It travelled across the British Empire and made its way into film festivals prior to Indian independence, and continues to be a force to reckon with. If Indian cinema in the 1950-1980s produced movies like The Apu Trilogy, Awara, Mera Nam Joker, Indian cinema has today, belted out mainstream hits and new age movies for the audience to consume. The Lunchbox (2013) for instance was screened in over 70 nations with little to no marketing. Indian movies have become so mainstream abroad that in 2015 a video surfaced on the Internet showing Miss Nigeria and Miss Indonesia bonding over their love for Bollywood films and simultaneously singing to Dil To Pagal Hai. Regional cinema has found its niche and own foreign markets, contributing effectively to Indian soft power, despite Bollywood’s overarching popularity.

BFI Southbank even celebrated Indian regional cinema in 2017 giving a platform to movies that are otherwise overshadowed by their Bollywood counterpart. Today, Indian films are celebrated world over – they are invited for screenings at virtually every film festival, have become some of the highest grossing films worldwide, movie stars are being invited to co-host or perform at major events, and the number of co-productions and star cross-overs is on the rise. Despite the hurdles that Indian cinema faced, it is undoubtedly one of India’s most powerful soft power tools.

Is it being leveraged?

But has cinema been leveraged as a soft power tool by India? If the WikiLeaks 2013 reports are to be believed, US officials had once wanted help from India to improve its image in Afghanistan and contemplated sending Bollywood stars there (Swaminathan, 2017). The plan never came to fruition but what is important is that such a plan even existed and shows the importance hard power nations give to soft power. On the other hand, despite Bollywood’s popularity in Pakistan, it has done little to foster better relations between the two countries. Cinema can be used as a tool to inform foreign audiences about India, to influences their views about the country, and to encourage tourism and trade. It is unclear of the role that cinema can play as a soft power in international relations thus far, nonetheless it will need to be included as a part of India’s foreign policy to leverage Bollywood’s popularity to India’s advantage.

 

Works Cited

Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., & Bode, M. (2004). Exporting Media Products: Understanding the Success and Failure of Hollywood Movies in Germany. Advances in Consumer Research Volume 31.

Tsering, L. (2015, July 13). ‘Bahubali’: Film Review. Retrieved November 11, 2018, from Hollywood Reporter: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/baahubali-film-review-808168

Cherian, V. K. (2016, October 31). India’s Film Society Movement: The Journey and its Impact. Retrieved November 12, 2018, from Google Books: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=iytw DQAAQBAJ&pg=PT31&lpg=PT31&dq=Macmillan+ International+Film+Encyclopedia+ pather+ panchali&source=bl&ots=NXCq1XAdeZ&sig=OyMnRdTYDfh5RhMs2V6k fDNPOs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjn5bCaps_eAhUXfCsKHWCBCsEQ6AEwC3oECAwQAQ#v=onepage&q= Macmillan% 20International%2 0Film%20Encyclopedia%20pather%20panchali&f=false

Brennan, J. R. (2005). Democratizing Cinema and Censorship in Tanzania, 1920-1980. Retrieved November 17, 2018, from The International Journal of African Historical Studies Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 481-511. JStor.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40033967

Luedi, J. (2018, February 3). Move Over India: How Bollywood Conquered Nigeria. Retrieved November 17, 2018, from Asia by Africa: https://www.asiabyafrica.com/point-a-to-a/bollywood-in-nigeria

Massey, R. (1974, May). The Indian Film Industry. Retrieved November 17, 2018, from Journal of the Royal Society of Arts Vol 122, No. 5214, pp 369-381. JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41371253

Central Board of Film Certification. (2016). Annual Report from April 2015 to March 2016. Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. New Delhi: Central Board of Film Certification.

Roy, A. G. (Ed.). (2012, July 11). The Magic of Bollywood: At Home and Abroad. Retrieved from Google Books: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=R-mICwAAQBAJ&pg=PT9&dq=indian+films+ abroad&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v =onepage&q=indian%20films%20abroad&f=false

Press Trust of India. (2017, June 9). I watched ‘Dangal’ and liked it: Chinese President Xi tells Modi. Retrieved November 19, 2017, from The Hindu: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/i-watched-dangal-and-liked-it-chinese-president-xi-tells-modi/article18931775.ece

Sridharan, V. (2013, November 6). Michelle Obama Dances to Bollywood Tunes during Diwali Celebrations [VIDEO]. Retrieved November 19, 2017, from International Business Times: https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/michelle-obama-diwali-white-house-washington-bollywood-520002

Ahmed, A. S. (1992, May). Bombay Films: The Cinema as Metaphor for Indian Society and Politics. Retrieved November 10, 2018, from Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2 (pp 289-320). Cambridge University Press. JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/312677

Mishra, V. (1989). The Texts of ‘Mother India’. Kunapipi , 11 (1, Article 14), 119-137.

Larkin, B. (1992, May). Indian Films and Nigerian Lovers: Media and the Creation of Parallel Modernities. Modern Asian Studies , 26 (2), pp. 289-320.

Barlet, O. (2010). Bollywood / Africa: A Divorce? Retrieved November 20, 2018, from Black Camera Vol 2 No. 1 pp 126-143, Indiana University Press. JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/blc.2010.2.1.126

Heide, W. v. (2002). The Malaysian Cinema. In W. v. Heide, Malaysian Cinema, Asian Film: Border Crossings and National Culture (pp. 161-240). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

Yusoff, N. (2013). Comtemporary Malaysian Cinema: Genre, Gender and Temporality. Retrieved November 25, 2018, from Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Sydney: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/bitstream/2123/9925/1/yusoff_n_thesis.pdf

Oonk, G. (2007). Global Indian Diasporas: Exploring Trajectories of Migration and Theory. Retrieved November 26, 2018, from Amsterdam University Press. JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n1bq.4

Verstappen, S., & Rutten, M. (2007). Bollywood and the Indian Diaspora: Reception of Indian cinema among Hindustani youth in the Netherlands. Retrieved November 25, 2018, from Global Indian Diasporas: Exploring Trajectories of Migration and Theory, Google Books: https://books.google.co.in/books?id=BkwsMTyShi8C&pg=PA211&lpg=PA211&dq=Sanderien+ Verstappen+and+Mario+Rutten+ bollywood&source=bl&ots=A4w8N92Hc&sig=T4DCXc75VgTcTO4VBZN6V8Alzyg&hl= en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj3zcH7tPHeAhWEfSsKHeZIDxUQ6AEwAXoECAQQAQ#v=onepage&q=Sanderien %20Verstappen%20and%20Mario%20 Rutten%20bollywood&f=false

Bhat, C., & Bhaskar, T. (2007). Contextualising Diasporic Identity: Implications of Time and Space on Telugu Immigrants. (G. Oonk, Ed.) Retrieved November 26, 2018, from Global Indian Diasporas: Exploring Trajectories of Migration and Theory. JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n1bq.7

Steene, G. V. (2012). Indophilie and Bollywood’s Popularity in Segenal: Strands of Identity Dynamics. In A. G. Roy, The Magic of Bollywood: At Home and Abroad. SAGE Publications India.

Aiyar, P. (2017, July 30). Rajinikanth: The Tamil Star Who Has a Cult Following In…Japan. Retrieved November 29, 2018, from South China Morning Post: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/society/article/2104058/tamil-star-who-inspired-new-life-paths-his-japanese-fan-club

Salazkina, M. (2010, Summer). Soviet-Indian Coproductions: Alibaba as Political Allegory. Retrieved November 18, 2018, from Cinema Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4 pp 71-89. JStor: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40801482

Cain, R. (2017, May 29). No, It’s Not A Typo — ‘Dangal’ Is Nearing $150 Million At China’s Box Office. Retrieved November 29, 2018, from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2017/05/29/no-its-not-a-typo-dangal-is-nearing-us-150-million-at-chinas-box-office/#55a3ab8e5b32

India Today. (2018, April 12). How Baahubali changed the face of Telugu cinema worldwide. Retrieved November 29, 2018, from India Today: https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/baahubali-telugu-cinema-abroad-1210757-2018-04-12

Cain, R. (2017, May 31). 5 Key Reasons For ‘Dangal’s’ Massive Success In China. Retrieved November 29, 2018, from Forbes:https://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2017/05/31/5-key-reasons-for-dangals-massive-success-in-china/#4b62a13935be

Swaminathan, R (2017). “Bollywood Boom”. Penguin Random House India, New Delhi.

 

References:

1     Although Bollywood is used as an umbrella term, the Indian film industry consist of Kollywood (Tamil), the two Tollywoods (Telugu and Tamil), Mollywood (Malayalam) and Sandalwood (Kannada).

2     Masala films refer to popular Indian cinema.

3     In Russia, Raj Kapoor and Mithun Chakraborty enjoy a demi-god like status, especially among the older generation who reminiscence and sing to Awaraand Disco Dancer.

4     Hema Malini was already a household name in the Soviet Union with two successful films – Sholay (1975) and Seetaaur Geeta (1972).

(Ms. Shreya C is a Research Fellow at India Foundation.)

(This article is carried in the print edition of March-April 2019 issue of India Foundation Journal.)

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic Soft Power Manifest in the Art and Culture of India

Though art and culture may outwardly seem to be independent, they are intimately interlinked and always go hand in hand. Common elements like cuisine, ornaments, dress, language, behaviour, music, dance, literature etc underlie the customs of every culture, each having its own uniqueness.Culture is reflective of the ethos of a particular society and determines its character.

Art is a product of culture, a defined creative approach to interpreting ideas, drawing images on canvas or in space, and creating concepts. It is a creative expression of deep thoughts and situations that trigger transcendent experiences presented orally, visually or interactively.Art can re-enchant the way humanity sees the world, especially in times of challenges and struggles. For instance, it can rekindle a sense of patriotism, stir people into right action, uplift their spirit and aspirations.

This intrinsic power of art and culture has a universal value that infuses all relations and relationships both at national and international level. When districts in states, states in a country, and countries in the globe come together, art and culture provide a vital fabric of expression and cooperation. It provides a beautiful medium to educate and enlighten the significance of the cultural ethics and ethos of different regions.

Influence of Cultural Linkages

Cultural linkages develop mutual respect and honour in international relations and a certain peace and joy in human relations. Beyond theboundaries and differences, theypromote a common ground to unite. For instance, India and Russia recently celebrated the 70th anniversary of their diplomatic relations with the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin blogging a special message in the Times of India on May 30, 2017 and Prime Minister Narendra Modi visiting Russia to mark the historic occasion.[i]

Influence of Indian culture on Russia predates economic and trade relations between India and the then USSR, to the 15th century, when AfanasiyNikitin, a merchant from the land of Tver in Russia, in his three-year stay (CE 1466 – CE 1472), documented every aspect of the Indian society in his book, A Journey Beyond the Three Seas.[ii] Since then, cultural exchanges between the two countries have followed a consistent trajectory. Nikitin’s book became a major motion picture in Russia in CE 1950, with the Russian actor Oleg Strizhenov playing Nikitin and co-featuring the Hindi actress, Nargis Dutt.[iii] In my international travels, I am yet to meet a Russian who has not hummed “Awara hoo” or “MerajoothahaiJapani…sar pe laal topirussi…” with such pride to display his love of Indian culture.

The setting up of the Mayuri Dance Company in the Russian Republic of Karelia stands as a testament to this influence. Vera Evgrafova, who has always had a love of Indian dance was deeply moved by the 1985 movie “Mayuri”, which featured the story of an Indian Bharatanatyam dancer named Sudha Chandran. With aspirations of being a Bharatanatyam dancer, Sudha Chandran begins her training in the dance as a young girl, but as a teenager, loses a leg in a car accident.  Sudha fights her struggles to regain her dignity and identity as a dancer.  Vera Evgrafova, was so inspired by this feature film, that she appropriated the name of the character (Mayuri) for her dance group that she formed with dancers who shared the love for Indian dances in 1987 Railway Workers Cultural Center in Petrozavodsk, the capital of the Republic of Karelia. Winning the “Narodiny” award in 1995 by the Karelian Ministry of Culture, Vera secured a spot at the state-wide level.[iv]

There are many such inspiring stories of countries coming together for peace and cooperation where culture has been a major factor promoting the respective national interest and contributing to a more peaceful world order.

International Recognition to Indian Cities for its Art and Culture

Three cities in India – Chennai,Varanasi and Jaipur – have joined the prestigious UNESCO Creative Cities Network for its rich music and cultural tradition. This world organization has identified culture and creativity as integral and strategic factors for development at the local level and strengthen mutual respect and cooperation at the international level.

During the December – January “Margazhi” month of the Tamil Calendar, Chennai celebrates its rich Carnatic music and classical dance,predominantly Bharatanatyam, attracting host of artistes and art lovers from all over the globe. It is a beautiful coincidence that it is held in the Tamil month of Margazhi – a month traditionally dedicated to religious activities and spiritual disciplines. People wake up early morning, sing hymns and devotional songs on the deities, participate in processions and cook delicious delicacies!“Among the 12 months, I am Margazhi,” says Lord Krishna in the Bhagavad Gita (verse 35, chapter 10).

For many in Chennai, “December season” as it has come to be known as, is like a pilgrimage. Around 3000 programs and performances take place in established and upcoming Sabhasor organisationsat over 300 venues in Chennai. Every Sabha reverberates with melody and rhythm in praise of the divine, through the composition of saints, sages and many great composers. In recent times, temples and ancient traditional houses also serve as venues for lectures, demonstrations and concerts.

I am a proud and happy Chennaite. Being a performer and a participant of this grand Dance-Music season, I have been enjoying this wondrous festival for decades now.The festival was launched  in 1927 as an adjunct to INC, and has now completed 92 glorious years!The schedule of at least the top 10 Sabhas, are published in The Hindu on December 1st supplement. There are apps now that track the schedule of sabhasandkutcheris(concerts) like MargazhiSangeetam, SaRiGaMa, Zeek and collection of favorite songs from Twang. Online websites like KutcheriBuzz are a great source of the season schedule too!

Performers save their best repertoire to showcase for the season, and the audience – their best ethnic attires! The ladies already plan a display of collection of their Kanchipuram silk sarees and jasmine flowers. The men join the show with their shawls,  Kurtas and veshtis!Margazhi is to Chennai as Ganges is to Varanasi. Perhaps no other city in the world has such a kind of festival.

“Varanasi was advocated as an ideal example of India’s intangible Cultural heritage as a combination of a temple city with its rich tradition in music. The Varanasi school of music or the Benaras gharana named after the city along with the semi classical genres like Hori, Chaiti, Tappa, Daadra are rich in musical heritage.The ghats, havelis and temples have housed the Benaras gharana and nurtured it backed with the Banaras Hindu University with its Music and Dance departments.The Government of Rajasthan nominated the Jaipur City under the Creative CitiesNetwork for its art & craft. 36 varieties of crafts were identified including the ones related to sculpture, pottery, textiles and jewellery making. Right from King Sawai Jai Singh II of Jaipur in 18th Century to his successors, the city has been nurtured as a centre of artistic excellence.”[v]As designated  members of UCCN (UNESCO’s Creative Cities Network), they reflect a hub for creativity and integrate culture into sustainable development plans.

Significance of Art and Culture in India

Indian culture is spiritual. It elevates and celebrates mankind, uplifts one to assimilate the four fundamental pursuits of mankind –(i) Dharma (righteous actions), (ii) Artha (securities like wealth, family, power and position), (iii) Kama (sensory, intellectual or emotional pleasures), and (iv) Moksha (enlightenment – gaining freedom from all limitations and sorrow). None of these pursuits are simple, because even though universal, the variety of human choices and the multiple layers of psychological complexities involved, give them a range of interpretations, perceptions and decisions.

The Vedic culture of India unfolds a universal vision that brings harmony in all these pursuits of mankind,with the environment. This harmony is easily attainable with the understanding that when the means or process of accomplishment of any pursuit is undertaken with commitment to right and ethical ways, harmony and fulfillment can be well orchestrated.

Art and Culture of India is Immortal

Do the expression of culture nurture and address all the needs of individuals? If they do not, that culture will not stand the test of time and would be outdated. The Puranas, Itihasaas, temple architecture, the folk lore, food, language, music, dance all seem to have an intrinsic strength to sustain, modify and adapt to the changing times without comprising on its integrity.Vedic culture seems to be relevant to all ages and at all times. Hence,in spite of many years of oppression, the culture today is still alive and celebrated!

For economic growth, technological, medical, industrial, and academic advancement is necessary but it cannot be used as a measure for inner growth or emotional maturity of a person.The struggling human heart always seeks fulfillment, wholeness, to be free from conflicts and pain. Vedic vision helps the individual resolve this fundamental struggle. Art and culture of India facilitates this resolution.

(Ms. Pavithra Srinivasan is a Bharatanatam Performer/Teacher and a Research Fellow at Centre for Soft Power, India Foundation, Chennai.)

[i]https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/russia-and-india-70-years-together/

[ii]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India–Russia_relations#Cooperation_in_the_cultural_sphere

[iii] Ibid

[iv]http://www.thediskcoordinator.com/mayuri.htm Also see, https://www.facebook.com/dancemayuri/

[v]https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/director-general-unesco-declares-varanasi-jaipur-under-creative-cities-network/articleshow/50143983.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 

 

 

 

 

 

India’s Vision for ‘Collective Prosperity’ in ASEAN

In January 2018, India hosted the leaders of all 10 ASEAN nations at the Republic Day Parade and set a historic milestone in the India-ASEAN partnership. India’s ties with South East Asia stretch back to more than two thousand years. The symbols of our shared cultural heritage and the Indian civilization are spread across the entire ASEAN region. Today, India-ASEAN partnership has gone beyond economic and cultural links, the formalization process of which started in 1992 Singapore Summit. Growing from dialogue partners to strategic partners, India has a growing economic, diplomatic and security partnership. There are 30 dialogue mechanisms between India and ASEAN, including an annual summit and seven ministerial dialogues.

India, the world’s fastest-growing major economy and a new frontier of global opportunities is an admirer of ASEAN’s own progress too and has always believed that ASEAN has a unique potential to contribute for the larger interests of the world beyond it. The ASEAN nations have an opportunity to become an integral partner in the New India’s transformation journey and to pursue higher aspirations together.

The developments of the last four years under Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ‘Act East Policy’ suggest that ASEAN countries are ready to participate in India’s vision of ‘Collective Prosperity.’

Myanmar

Myanmar shares a geostrategic land and a maritime border with India which includes a 1,640-km-long border with India’s four northeastern states – Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, and Arunachal Pradesh. Prime Minister Modi calls Myanmar “a land bridge that connects India with Southeast Asia.” In 2016, during the visit of then President of Myanmar Htin Kyaw to India both countries signed some key agreements for the construction of 69 bridges on the Tamu-Kalewa section of the India-Myanmar-Thailand (IMT) highway and improvements on the Kalewa-Yargi section1. The IMT highway has the potential to transform the economic landscape of the entire region as it will connect the Moreh in India’s Manipur state to Mae Sot in Thailand via Myanmar.

In India’s physical connectivity vision for the ASEAN, the role of Myanmar is crucial. Some of the other key connectivity projects between India and Myanmar are: Kaladan Multi-modal Transit Transport Project, the Rhi-Tiddim Road Project, and Border Haats etc.The Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project was launched to create a Multimodal transit transport system which involves connecting the eastern Indian seaport of Kolkata with Sittwe seaport in Rakhine State, Myanmar by sea (shipping route of 539 km). In Myanmar, it will then link Sittwe seaport to Paletwa via the Kaladan riverboat route (inland water transport route of 158 km), and then from Paletwa by road to Mizoram state in Northeast India2.  Also, the extension projects of IMT trilateral highway to Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam are being planned and consultations in this direction are going on.

India’s participation in Myanmar’s socio-economic development is significant and it is widely appreciated by the Myanmar government. Whether its infrastructure development, agriculture research or human resources capacity building assistance, India stands with Myanmar in their endeavors to stability and growth. In 2017, India committed to assisting in the Rakhine State Development programme and in December 2018, during the President Ram Nath Kovind’s visit to Myanmar, we handed over the first 50 units of prefabricated houses built in Rakhine State. India’s assistance portfolio to Myanmar is at present worth over $1.73 billion.

The trade between both sides has doubled over the last decade. Some leading Indian oil and gas companies are in the process of opening their offices in Myanmar. In September 2017, Assam based Numaligarh Refinery signed an agreement3 with the Parami Energy Group of Myanmar for supplying petroleum products through Moreh-Tamu land border to Northern and Western Myanmar. In the month of December 2018, an Enterprise India show was held in Myanmar, in which a number of Indian SMEs also took part.

Vietnam

Defence and Security cooperation is a crucial pillar in the strategic partnership between India and Vietnam. In May 2015, Defence Ministers of the two countries signed a “Joint Vision Statement on India-Vietnam Defence Relations -2015-2020”. An agreement on cooperation between the Coast Guards of the two countries was also signed for mutual crime prevention efforts and the development of transnational cooperation. India’s National Security Advisor AjitDoval has affirmed that India would do all it can to assist Vietnam in defence and security domains, particularly in military technology, intelligence, personnel training and cyber security4. During PM Modi’s visit to Vietnam in September 2016, India and Vietnam formally upgraded their relationship to ‘Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.’ The upgraded partnership is designed to provide a new direction to the bilateral cooperation. Both countries have signed another important agreement for Inter-Governmental Framework for the Exploration of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes. PM Modi announced a new line of credit US$500 million to Vietnam for the procurement of defence equipment5.

Vietnam wants to build up a strong deterrence against China’s rise and its aggressive moves in the South China Sea and India’s defence capabilities can provide good support to Vietnam’s defence needs. Indian Armed forces are cooperating with Vietnamese Armed Forces particularly the Navy, in the process of capacity building. India has already been providing assistance to Vietnam’s navy through training to operate the new Russian-built submarines.

In the last four years, a number of significant bilateral visits took place between the two countries including the recent visit of President of India, Shri Ram Nath Kovind to Vietnam. Apart from defense, other emerging areas of cooperation between India and Vietnam are: energy, agriculture, agro-processing, textile, biotech, pharmaceuticals, minerals, marine and wood products etc. The bilateral trade between India and Vietnam has increased about ten folds in ten years and last year it touched US$ 12.8 billion, which makes India one of the top trading partners of Vietnam.

Laos

In September 2016, PM Modi participated in the 11th East Asia and 14th India-ASEAN summit in Vientiane, Laos. On the sidelines of the summit, PM Modi held bilateral engagements too which included talks with Laotian Prime Minister ThonglounSisoulith. Both sides have agreed that the bilateral trade between India and Laos is lower than its real potential and there is a great scope for the promotion of new trade opportunities among the business fraternity of both sides. In November 2018, the 9th Joint Commission Meeting6 on Bilateral Cooperation between the Laos and India was held in Vientiane, Lao PDR, in which several avenues to enhance trade were discussed. India’s engagement in Laos is centered on agriculture, irrigation, power, education and human resources capacity development through trainings.

India is facilitating the implementation of irrigation projects in Xayaboury, Vientiane and Savannakhet provinces, through a $30.94 million Line of Credit and has approved $72.44 million of fund for setting up a university of agriculture and training centres in Champasack province of Laos. India has also extended Duty Free Tariff Preference Schemes7 to Lao PDR to encourage the exports of goods from Lao PDR to India.

Thailand

Thailand is one the key trading partners of India in ASEAN. The bilateral trade between India and Thailand is on an upward trajectory. In June 2016, during the visit of Prime Minister of Thailand to India8, the first India-Thailand Business Forum came up with recommendations to scale up business and investment opportunities between the two countries. Thai investment in manufacturing and infrastructure initiatives of India are quite significant. Apart from skill development, tourism, and film production there are some dedicated efforts going on to forge sister state/city relations between Assam and Chiang Mai as well as Surat and Surat Thani.

Cambodia

India and Cambodia share strong cultural and traditional links. Under ‘Act East Policy’ a satisfactory pace of development is going on to align this relation with the contemporary realities. India’s role in human resource development and capacity building initiatives in Cambodia is significant and now the focus is on moving towards infrastructural development, conservation and the preservation of historical monuments. During Prime Minister of Cambodia Samdech Hun Sen’s India visit in January 2018, the two countries signed four key agreements to enhance bilateral cooperation and to deal with mutual challenges of human trafficking9. India granted a $36.92 million line of credit to facilitate the development of Stung SvaHab water resource development project. PM Modi has also announced the setting up of a centre of excellence related to Information Technology in Cambodia to train Cambodian youths. India is actively involved in the social development of Cambodia through Quick Impact Projects under the Mekong Ganga Cooperation initiative. PM Modi has decided to increase the number of annual Quick Impact Projects from five to ten and established a project development fund of Rs. 500 crore to expand industry and business links10.

Malaysia

Malaysia is the third largest trading partner of India in ASEAN and a key investment partner in the region. The two-way commercial engagements between both countries are traditionally strong which further strengthened with the signing of a bilateral comprehensive economic cooperation agreement in 2011, revised double taxation avoidance agreement in 2012, and the MoU on Customs Cooperation signed in 2013. Some Malaysian companies are actively participating in the infrastructure projects in different states of India. And other than the Indian businesses, there is a strong presence of Indian community in Malaysia too which plays the role of a significant bridge between both nations.

In the last few years, the bilateral trade between India and Malaysia has increased more than two folds and reached close to $13 billion in 2017. There are growing synergies between the infrastructure companies of India and their Malaysian counterparts. In 2017 during the visit of former Prime Minister of Malaysia Najib Razak, Indian and Malaysian infrastructure companies signed business deals of worth US$36 billion, of which projects of $32.13 billion will be implemented in Malaysia while $3.86 billion worth of projects are planned to be executed in India. According to Malaysia’s Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB), as of 2017, Malaysian companies have completed 53 highway and road projects worth RM 9.3 billion (US$ 2.84 billion) in India11.

Transforming India offers tremendous opportunities for infra players of Malaysia, and for Indian construction companies, Malaysia is a crucial partner in the South East Asian market. According to some official stats, around 120 Indian companies, including 61 Indian joint ventures, 7 Indian Public Sector Undertakings, and 60 Indian IT companies are operating in or from Malaysia. The new areas of private sector cooperation between both sides are textiles, pharmaceuticals, glass containers, automobile associated industries, chemicals, biotechnology, healthcare, etc. In future through some active bilateral business forums such as Malaysia-India business council and India-Malaysia CEOs’ Forum, these commercial exchanges are expected to further accelerate.

Indonesia

Indonesia is one of India’s key neighbours in the region with which it shares a continuity of culture and civilization traditions. Today, both countries are focusing on enhancing bilateral trade exchanges too. The 2nd meeting of India-Indonesia CEO forum which was held in May 2018 yielded some concrete outcomes such as setting up of Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) office in Jakarta. In March 2018, the first ever India-Indonesia Infrastructure Forum meeting was organized by the Indian embassy in Jakarta in which a high-level delegation of nearly 30 plus Indian CEOs from infrastructure sector were present and some 80 Indonesian infrastructure companies took part. In the month of November 2018, an India-Indonesia Business forum (IIBF) was also held at Port Blair in Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Following the state visit of Indonesian President Joko Widodo to India in December 2016 and the first-ever visit of PM Modi to Indonesia in May 2018, some successful bilateral ministerial-level defence and energy sector related exchanges also took place and the frequency of these exchanges suggest a mutual desire to enhance ties12. For many years both countries are an active partner in naval exercises/patrolling and now there is a shared desire to deepen these maritime engagements in the light of changing dynamics of Indo-Pacific region.

Singapore

Singapore is India’s leading economic partner and a key global strategic partner. Bilateral relations between India and Singapore have a strong cultural and commercial background and political relations are based on trust and appreciation for each other’s potential. The economic cooperation between both countries is vibrant and spanned across all priority sectors of two sides. A good number of Indian companies are operating in and from Singapore which makes it India’s crucial source as well as the destination of investment. To further leverage these warm ties India and Singapore have signed the Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA).

Singapore is known as the Fintech hub of the world. By keeping the growing global trends of Fintech innovations in mind, PM Modi has established a joint working group of Fintech in which the Monetary Authority of Singapore and Financial Services department of Ministry of Finance, India and other relevant stakeholders of both sides will work together to promote knowledge exchange and cooperation between the Fintech firms. In May 2018, at the ‘Business Innovation and Community’ event in Singapore, PM Modi has launched India’s BHIM, RuPay and SBI app.

The Network for Electronic Transfers of Singapore (NETS) and the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) also signed an agreement to extend Bharat Interface for Money (BHIM) to recognize SGQR (Singapore Quick Response Code) for payments in Singapore. And India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) based cross-border remittance app (SBI app) will facilitate the remittances by Indian workers13. The partnership between NETS and NPCI and the launch of Indian digital payment apps in Singapore are some remarkable moves toward internationalization and branding of Indian digital payment frameworks.

Singapore is a global centre of tech and innovation and it is the only country in ASEAN with which India’s exchanges are designed around the changing needs of our time. After Fintech, Smart Cities is another futuristic area where this partnership is going well. Singapore government’s Centre for Liveable Cities in partnership with the Town and Country Planning Organization of India has launched a programme to train 100 Indian officials in Singapore for effective planning and execution of India’s Smart Cities Mission. During PM Modi’s recent Singapore visit at the “India and Singapore: Stepping into Future” business event, some 13 agreements related to investment promotion, start-ups, FinTech, artificial intelligence, data analytics, and water management etc. were signed. The Indian government’s India-Singapore Entrepreneurship Bridge (InSpreneur) initiative held two editions in 2018 and now Start-up Singapore has announced the Singapore-India Incubation Programme which aims to provide exposure and support for emerging start-ups keen to explore both markets.

Philippines

On 27th Jan 2019, a Philippine church got bombed by terrorists, in which more than 20 civilians were killed and many got brutally injured. Dealing with the ever-growing threats of radical Islamic terrorism is one of the mutual challenges for India and all ASEAN nations. On several occasions, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has invited South East Asian nations to join hands in the fight against terrorism. The Defence and Security cooperation are the focal points of discussion in India-Philippines dialogues. The frequency of bilateral exchanges between both nations, which started with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the Philippines to attend ASEAN and EAS Summits in the month of November 2017, has substantially increased. In terms of trade, India is exploring opportunities for investments in Philippine markets in the sector of pharmaceutical, information technology, energy, and transportation, which in turn will lead to generation of thousands of local jobs. The India-Philippines bilateral trade stands at nearly $2 billion in 2016-17, while India’s exports amounted to $1.487 billion and imports to $494 million.

For more than five decades Indian companies and Filipino joint ventures are thriving in the Philippines such as India’s Aditya Birla Group through its Indo Phil Textile Mills and the Ispat Group which owns and operate Philippines’s largest plant with an investment of $254 million. Recently GMR group Ltd joined hands with a local company Megawide for airport maintenance and upgrading related projects. Other Indian automobile giants such as Tata Motors and Mahindra, and IT/ITES companies like Wipro, TCS, L&T Infotech, Infosys, Tech Mahindra etc. are active in the Philippines markets. The Indian Pharma majors like Dabur Pharma, Lupin Ltd., Torrent Pharma, Zydus Cadila, and Claris Lifesciences have also set up a liaison office to promote their products in the Philippines market. And Kalpataru and Kamani Engineering Corporation are engaged in the transmission line projects in the Mindanao regions of the Philippines. A couple of Joint Working Groups have also been set up to explore two-way trade and investment opportunities14.

Brunei

The bilateral trade between India and Brunei has more than doubled over the last decade and stood at $504 billion in 2016-17. In the last four years, some efforts have been made to explore mutually beneficial trade opportunities through regular exchanges. In September 2016, Indian Chamber of commerce, Kolkata organized a ‘Buyer Seller Meet and Exhibition’ in Brunei, in which Indian companies from diverse sectors including heavy engineering, electronics, education, textiles, and handicrafts participated15. Apart from defence and security, energy is one of the most dominant themes of our bilateral exchanges with Brunei. In the month of November 2016, the Indian government has organized a high-level delegation meeting comprising of the foreign, trade, energy, and finance ministers of Brunei with the business leaders and their Indian ministerial counterparts in India, which yielded some positive outcomes.

In his op-ed piece “ASEAN-India: Shared Values, Common Destiny” which was published simultaneously on 26th January 2018 in all the leading dailies of the ASEAN member nations, Prime Minister Modi has said: “Indians have always looked East to see the nurturing sunrise and the light of opportunities. Now, as before, the East, or the Indo-Pacific Region, will be indispensable to India’s future and our common destiny.”

In the past, in an environment of turbulence and hostility, some responsible regional players of South East Asia laid the foundation of ASEAN, and united 10 countries for a common vision of economic growth and security. Today ASEAN can again play a defining role for a stable, prosperous and peaceful future of the region and the world.

References:

1       India- Myanmar Joint Statement during the visit of the President of Myanmar to India (29 August 2016)

       https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/27343/India+Myanmar+Joint+Statement+ during+the+visit+of+the+President+of+Myanmar+to+India+29+August+2016

2     Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project-Status Note, Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region

       http://mdoner.gov.in/infrastructure/kaladan-multi-modal-transit-transport-project-inland

3     Numaligarh Refinery becomes Myanmar’s sixth fuel retailer, published at The Hindu Business Line, on 10 January

       2018 https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/companies/numaligarh-refinery-becomes-myanmars-sixth-fuel-retailer/article9842395.ece

4     Achievement: India-Vietnam Defence and Security Cooperation by Brig Vinod Anand, published at VIF on May 12, 2017

       https://www.vifindia.org/article/2017/may/12/achievements-india-vietnam-defence-and-security-cooperation

5     India offers $500 million defense credit as Vietnam seeks arms boost by Ho Binh Minh published at REUTERS on September 3, 2016

       https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-india/india-offers-500-million-defense-credit-as-vietnam-seeks-arms-boost-idUSKCN11905U.

6     Agreed Minutes of the Ninth Joint Commission Meeting on Bilateral Cooperation between India and Lao PDR (November 23, 2018)

       https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl30627Agreed_Minutes_of_the_Ninth_Joint_ Commission_Meeting_on_Bilateral_Cooperation_between_India_and_Lao_ PDR_November_23_2018

7     Preferential Market Access: India’s Duty Free Tariff Preference Scheme for LDCs published on December 28, 2016

       https://www.un.org/ldcportal/preferential-market-access-indias-duty-free-tariff-preference-scheme-for-ldcs/

8     India-Thailand Joint Statement during the visit of Prime Minister of Thailand to India

       https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/26923/IndiaThailand+Joint+Statement+during+the+ visit+of+Prime+Minister+of+Thailand+to+India

9     India-Cambodia Joint Statement during State Visit of Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia to India (January 27, 2018)

       https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/29394/IndiaCambodia_Joint_Statement_during_State_ Visit_of_Prime_Minister_of_the_Kingdom_of_Cambodia_to_India_January_27_2018

10  Press Statement by PM Modi with PM of Cambodia Hun Sen published on January 27, 2018

       https://www.narendramodi.in/press-statement-by-pm-modi-with-pm-of-cambodia-hun-sen-538675

11  Joint Statement of the India – Malaysia CEO’s Forum, New Delhi (March 31, 2017) published on April 01, 2017

       https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/28294/Joint+Statement+of+the+India++Malaysia+ CEOs+Forum+New+Delhi+March+31+2017

12 India-Indonesia Joint Statement during visit of Prime Minister to Indonesia (May 30, 2018)

       https://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/29932/IndiaIndonesia+Joint+Statement+during+ visit+of+Prime+Minister+to+Indonesia+May+30+2018

13 India-Singapore Joint Statement during visit of Prime Minister to Singapore (June 01, 2018)

       https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/29942/IndiaSingapore+Joint+Statement+during+ visit+of+Prime+Minister+to+Singapore+June+01+2018

14  India-Philippines Bilateral Brief, Embassy of India, Manila, Philippines

       http://www.eoimanila.gov.in/page/bilateral-political-and-cultural-relations/

15  INDIA-BRUNEI BILATERAL BRIEF, High Commission of India, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam

       http://www.hcindiabrunei.gov.in/page/india-brunei-bilateral/

(Ms. Devsena Mishra is a promoter of advanced technologies, startup ecosystem and the
Indian government’s business and technology related initiatives like Digital India, Make in India,
Smart Cities, and Startup India. Views expressed are personal.)

(This article is carried in the print edition of January-February 2019 issue of India Foundation Journal.)

 

 

Book Review: Unruly Waters

How Mountain Rivers and Monsoons Have Shaped South Asia’s History

Author: Sunil Amrith

Publisher: Allen Lane, 2018, PP 416

Price: Rs.799/-

Book Review by: K. Raka Sudhakar Rao

The centrality of water to South Asian civilizational dynamics is indisputable. This is more so for India, where rivers starting from the evanescent Saraswati to  eternally inspiring Ganga to the Godavari and Kaveri down south, not to speak of the mighty and ‘maha-baahu’ (deep-chested and huge-armed) Brahmaputra, inspired the course of history. Indians are essentially river people. People identify themselves as “Chora Ganga KinareWallah” or “Saryu Paree” or “Saraswats” or even ‘Sindhis’.  The rains, rivers, coasts and the seas have shaped the history of not just India, but the whole of South Asia.

In South Asia, water has spurred dreams of political freedom and economic development. This quest has egged them to re-engineer the flow of water through a slew of dams, barrages, reservoirs and aqueducts regardless of the environmental consequences. It has also catalysed inter-state and inter-country rivalry for control over water resources. Thus, water in India has both been a great cultural unifier as well as a nasty political divider.  Water is also politis.

Through his book Unruly Waters: How Mountain Rivers and Monsoons Have Shaped South Asia’s History, Mehra Family professor of South Asian Studies at the Harvard and MacArthur fellow, Sunil Amrith presents a compelling history of India over the last two centuries from the perspective of the deep interplay of its people and their tryst with water and of course, the weather. Amrith, whose earlier book Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and Fortunes of Migrants too talks about India and its tryst with water, continues his study of governing influence of monsoon in the current book too. He makes the profoundly significant statement that the Indian Ocean was a weather factory: the source of India’s climate. The Indian subcontinent “is the crucible of the monsoon and more than 70% of India’s total annual rainfall occurs during those three months. Despite a vast expansion of irrigation since independence in 1947, 60% of India’s agriculture is rain-fed” the author points out.

India presents a great paradox as waters that have profoundly affected the contours of its history so much,  deliver only 4 per cent of world’s fresh waters and provide fresh water to just 14 per cent of its population.  But it is this water that funded the British affluence and supported its military might. He recounts how British masters’ avaricious quest for revenues even in times of acute famines midwifed by truant monsoons wrought catastrophe on the country. The other side of this story is the efforts of visionary Europian mandarins who tried to master India’s water map of the country. This is another typical Indian paradox. Even while fighting the hegemonistic British rule, Indias venerated modern day Bhageeraths like Sir Arthur Cotton, who helped materialise marvels like irrigation projects, dams and an enviable reticulum of canals to turn a poor region into “an expanse of irrigated fertility,” to paraphrase the author. Similarly, the Himalayan mountain range disgorges 10 rivers that serve a fifth of humanity, running through 16 countries and fed by innumerable tributaries. The Ganga basin has thus become the hub that fuelled economics not just in South Asia but also in the Mekang region.

The book, a result of eight long years of scouring through the dusty archives stacked away in the labyrinthine storehouses of Imperialist British era, also chronicles the financial felicity of Indian economy catalysed by its maritime activity during the 16th Century.  He writes: “Indian economy absorbed 20 per cent of the world’s silver between 1600 and 1800. Throughout South East Asia’s era of commercial expansion in the 16th Century, Indian traders from the coasts of Gujarat, Madras and Bengal shipped cloth to Pegu and Tennasserim in Burma, to the thriving port of Melaka on the Malay peninsula and to the Indonesian islands of Sumatra and Java, the author says.

He also tells us how the Moghuls and Sher Shah Suri improvised the already existing irrigation systems and how the Britishers stabilised the same systems using the modern technology during the 18th Century. Even after Independence, this quest to ‘free India from the seasons’ continued and Nehru termed these big irrigation projects “the new temples of India.”  ”Dams were the single largest form of public investment in modern India. Swallowing considerably more government expenditure than health care or education …. More than any other technology, they promised a mastery of nature,” writes Amrith.  But he is also not oblivious to the perils of big projects. He also laments that among the powers was a lamentable and “a willful blindness to the consequences of repeated attempts to conquer nature,” says Amrith. Sunil Amrith warns about the ecological impact of the ‘desease of gigantism’ sweeping through the South Asia. He argues that big dams may not always be the panacea for India’s water woes.

Amrith also talks about the positive and constructive role being played by NGOs and civil society organisations in efficient water management.  In the last chapter titled ‘Stormy Horizons,’ he talks about initiatives such as the ‘Third Pole’s Mapping Platforms, which imparts an ability to envision the risks involved in water management.  The taut narration has a lyrical lilt to it and makes this book a fascinating read. This original work of history will go a long way in improving our understanding of India’s water systems.

(Shri K. Raka Sudhakar Rao is a Hyderabad-based journalist and commentator.
He can be reached at krakasudhakarrao@gmail.com )

(This Book Review is carried in the print edition of March-April 2019 issue of India Foundation Journal.)

 

 

 

 

Conference on Soft Power 2018

Soft power is the ability of nations to shape the preferences and influence the behaviour of other nations through appeal and attraction as opposed to coercion. It represents one of the frameworks through which India can understand and influence its role in the international order. In this backdrop, India Foundation’s Center for Soft Power hosted the first international Conference on Soft Power that aimed to engage in discussions on the need for an India-centric discourse on soft power, how to maximise and deploy soft power assets, particularly in the view of furthering national, regional and global goals, and India’s rise as a soft power nation. The Conference was organised over three days on 17-19 December, 2018 in New Delhi and saw the participation of 63 speakers from 16 countries and over 250 delegates, deliberate on various themes including public diplomacy, yoga, cinema, digital storytelling, Ayurveda, cuisine, performing arts, art craft and design, education, tourism, spirituality, language and literature, and museums and soft power. The conference was inaugurated by the Hon’ble Vice President of India, Shri Venkaiah Naidu. The conference was hosted in collaboration with Nehru Memorial Museum and Library and the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR), with the Center for Public Diplomacy of the University of Southern California and Nalanda University as the lead academic partners.

DAY I – 17th DECEMBER, 2018

Pre-Conference Workshop

Prior to the inaugural session, a workshop was held for pre-registered participants, that looked at digital storytelling as a means of soft power. The interactive workshop was conducted by Ms. Stacy Ingber, Assistant Director for Programming and Events, USC Centre on Public Diplomacy and Ms. Amara Aguilar, Associate Professor, USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.

The workshop began with Ms. Aguilar giving an account of how devices such as mobile phones have become the primary source of data storage, media consumption and communication across the world. She pointed out that as technology improves, people are attempting to find new and alternative ways of interacting with their audiences in a more engaging manner. She outlined the specifics of different target audiences and how the data they receive differs based on factors such as age, likes and dislikes, and how this in turn is used by different social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter, with each one attempting to cater to a specific type of content and a specific audience.

She stressed on the need to think of content circulation and virality in a visual manner. The chance of data being spread across a large number of people is increased significantly when accompanied with visuals. Therefore, it is important that all entities, whether countries or individuals, understand the power of visuals when it comes to sharing a message or data online. In terms of soft power, this is important because it can affect the way a country tells its story to a larger audience. Furthermore, she pointed out the importance of understanding the platform on which the data is being shared, and how that affects the reach of that data – going on to discuss the demographics, purposes and downsides of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Pinterest, etc. Finally, the participants were shown some of the tools available for them to ensure that their content reaches as wide a viewership as possible and were able to create a “story” in a hands-on manner.

Inaugural Session

The Chief Guest of the inaugural session was the Hon’ble Vice President of India, Shri Venkaiah Naidu. The session began with an address by Shri Vinay Sahasrabuddhe, President of ICCR, who said that “soft power is essentially about mind space and that is where it differs from hard power. Soft power is not about military might, and the pursuance of soft power helps in withering away of borders.” He also stressed on the fact that most issues arise from a lack of understanding between people and praised the ability of soft power to create harmony instead of division.

In his inaugural address, the Hon’ble Vice President spoke about how India can create its own discourse using soft power as since ancient times, India has been a centre of culture and spirituality. He stressed that India never aspired to be a hegemonic power and always believed in peaceful co-existence. For this, India has always used its soft power as a tool for the welfare and betterment of the society as a whole. He said that from yoga to spirituality, India can use its soft power to reach out to all segments of the global society. He also stated that India, being an ancient civilization, has much to offer culturally to the world serving as a link between these nations.

The Hon’ble Vice President’s inaugural address was followed by a riveting conversation between Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev, a yogi, mystic and founder of Isha Foundation, and Mr. Subhash Kak, a scientist, author and Regents professor at Oklahoma State University, USA. The stimulating conversation revolved around science and spirituality and how we can shape a society with seeking as the highest goal. On India’s soft power, Sadhguru said, “If we bring this one thing, that the highest aspect in the world is seeking the truth and liberation, you will naturally have the fragrance of this culture everywhere. It is a natural consequence of seeking”. Sadhguru also addressed the gathering on artificial intelligence and the future of the society, the role of education, and the possibility of bringing back Sanskrit as a mainstream language in India.

DAY II – 18th DECEMBER, 2018

Session 1: Panel Discussion – Cuisine

The first session of the day was a panel discussion on “Indian cuisine as soft power”. The discussion was chaired by Advaita Kala. Chef Vikas Khanna, a restaurateur and judge of MasterChef India began the “delicious” discussion by stating that Indian cuisine has now begun to establish itself in the world food market.

He narrated his experiences from New York and how people were oblivious to the depth and complexities of Indian food, which made it difficult for Indian Chefs to break into the market. However, now as the average American consumer is becoming more aware about Indian food, there is a growing audience and market for it. He also pointed out that due to the lack of India’s presence in food events, it is difficult to promote the cuisine to an international market, but this trend has been changing positively.

The next speaker was Mr Rohit Khattar, Chairman of Old World Hospitality, the group that runs the restaurants at Habitat Centre, New Delhi and the world famous Indian Accent restaurants. He spoke about how he took Indian food to London in 1997 where he observed that most chefs at Indian restaurants were Bangladeshis serving ‘typical gravies’. However, over the years, modern Indian restaurants have come up, that provide a different experience of Indian food than the stereotypical dishes such as Indian Accent that have found a niche audience in cities like New York.

Mr Manjit Singh Gill, President of Indian Federation of Culinary Association, pointed out the inherent difference between the way India and the West view food. He said the West views food as a commodity while in India we view it as a manifestation of God. He pointed out that most consumers of Indian food are unaware of the diversity of the cuisine and restaurants abroad are not innovative in their menus, only offering the typical butter chicken masala and dals. He stressed on the inherent Ayurvedic and wellness properties of Indian food, and how that can serve as a point of entry for many people to Indian cuisine.

Session 2: Keynote Address and Panel Discussion – Public Diplomacy

The session on “Public Diplomacy” began with a Keynote Address by Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin, India’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations at New York. Ambassador Akbaruddin gave the audience an overview of the present state of Indian soft power and noted that large scale multinational institutions such as the United Nations serve as assets of soft power, as they allow India to interact with multiple nations at once, and dictate the manner in which it is perceived at the international level. He continued by highlighting some of India’s significant contributions to the international order, and how these contributions must be better communicated so as to maximise Indian soft power. He cited the example of Hansa Mehta who was instrumental in shaping the wording of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights from “all men are born free and equal” to the more gender sensitive, “all human beings are born free and equal”. He also spoke of the little-spoken about role that Indian peacekeeping forces are playing and said that these are instances where “we got the implementation right but did not take credit”. He pointed to the success of yoga at the international level, and projects such as the International Day of Yoga, as striking the balance between implementation and communication.

The Keynote Address was followed by a panel discussion on “Public Diplomacy and Soft Power” that was moderated by Amb. Kanwal Sibal, former Foreign Secretary to the Government of India. The first panelist, Dr. Jay Wang, Director of the USC Center of Public Diplomacy, spoke of the need to shift to a more strategic form of public diplomacy in the age of soft power and technology. He said that the aim of public diplomacy should not be to simply convey a country’s message but also its culture and its values, thereby creating an effective soft power tool. Mr Kieran Drake, Minister Counsellor: Head of Politics and Press, at the British High Commission in India, spoke next and

outlined the challenges and successes that the United Kingdom government faced through its GREAT campaign. The campaign was a coordinated attempt to use media as a means of communicating British culture and soft power throughout the world. The final panelist, Mr. Jonathan McClory, author of SoftPower 30, spoke of his experience in creating the SoftPower 30 report, and on India’s ranking in the list. He pointed out that India was not excluded from the list, but faired poorly on many criteria despite having a rich culture, and thereby was not part of the top 30.  He shed light on the methodology of the paper, and said that while India has enormous cultural capital, it falls short in other key areas that bring down its ranking despite having the potential to be an influential country in terms of soft power.

Session 3: Panel Discussion – Museums

The next Panel Discussion was themed around “Museums as Soft Power” and was chaired by Ms Masooma Rizvi, an art consultant. The first presenter was Ms Ngaire Blankenberg, Cultural Consultant and Co-Editor ‘Cities, Museums and Soft power’ who describes herself as a “museum doctor”. She outlined that need to revisit and think of soft power differently, away from Joseph Nye’s conception of soft power, which is outdated in some aspects, especially in the way it views museums as a soft power tool. She said that museums are representative symbols and help shape narratives while also acting as a public space. However, the current perception of museums is that of being for an elite crowd, and so to truly harness the soft power potential of museums, it is essential that visitor services must be upgraded and special attention must be given to empowerment of the staff. She noted that museums must be experiences to engage the audience and to effectively tell its story, citing examples of museums from India to Spain.

The next presenter was Ms. Deepika Ahlawat, Museum Curator and Art Consultant who is based in London. She spoke about how museums help preserve colonialism by telling the story from a Euro-centric angle and highlighted how Western museums rarely repatriate objects they stole from the colonized country. In a way, museums are a continuation of colonialism and shape narratives from their viewpoint. Notable exceptions are some new museums that are sprouting up in former colonized countries that are willing to tell stories from their perspectives and thereby can act as an effective tool of soft power.

The last presenter, Ms. Nalina Gopal, Curator at India Heritage Centre at Singapore, outlined how India’s cultural influence in South East Asia, and the high levels of Indian immigration, has positively affected India’s perception in Singapore. She said it was this perception that facilitated the creation of the Indian Heritage Centre, which aims to provide visitors with an understanding of India and its roots.

Session 4: Panel Discussion – Performing Arts

The post lunch panel discussed the role of performing arts in soft power and was chaired by Ms. Rukmini Vijayakumar, a Bharatanatyam dancer. The first panellist, Ms. Mira Kaushik, Director, Akademi London, stressed on the need for collaborative productions that blend classical Indian styles with western stories, and vice versa, as these would provide a relatable entry point for audiences around the world to Indian performing arts. The next panellist, Mr. Jonathan Hollander, Director of Battery Dance, New York noted the power of India and how its artists acted as cultural ambassadors. He remarked that the depth and variety that exists in Indian performing arts is what makes it unique, and separates it from all other countries. He also stressed the need for investment at the state, national and international level to truly harness the power of Indian performing arts. The final panellist, Ms. Sharon Wezer, Director of the Indian Dance Europe at the Netherlands, spoke about her work in creating the ‘Indian Dance Festival’ in the Netherlands, as a way of introducing Indian dance forms to a Dutch audience. She spoke about how her dance group, looked to combine elements of familiar western classical arts with unfamiliar Indian dance forms so as to reach a wider audience.

Session 5: Panel Discussion – Art, Craft & Design

The next session on Art, Craft and Design was chaired by Ms. Jaya Jaitly, Founder, Dastkari Haat Samiti and the panelists included Mr. Rahul Goswami, UNESCO expert on intangible cultural heritage in the Asia-Pacific region; Ms. Shelly Jyoti, Visual Artist and Independent Curator; Ms. Valerie Wilson, Author and Founder Moti Clothing Company; Mr. Robert Borden,; and Ms. Gaia Franchetti, owner, IndoRoman.

The first presenter, Ms. Gaia Franchetti, owner of IndoRoman in Italy, noted that Indian textiles, and Khadi in particular, have the ability to form strong cultural and soft power relations with other

nations. She said that given the role that Khadi has played in Indian history, it can carry a clear Indian identity to numerous countries across the world. Ms. Shelly Jyoti, a visual artist from Delhi, spoke about how art can act as a means of introducing people to India’s values and its culture. She spoke of how we must be using resources such as Khadi and Ajrakh to promote Gandhian philosophy around the world. The growing desire for handmade commodities and organic goods provides Indian textiles with the perfect opportunity to reach a larger audience than ever before. Ms. Valerie Wilson, the founder of Moti Clothing Company in Australia, was the next presenter. She shed light on the “charming irregularities”, primacy of relationships, hard work and continuous learning that Indian clothing conveys to foreign audiences. She also spoke about her efforts in marketing Indian clothing abroad, and attempting to overcome the negative perceptions that it carried. Her presentation was followed by a presentation by Mr. Robert Borden, Vice President of Enrolment, California Institute of the Arts (CalArts), who pointed out how institutions like CalArts act as the incubators for creative talent. These institutions he said offer artists a platform to express their art on the global stage and to a wider audience and thus further soft power. Mr. Rahul Goswami, UNESCO expert on Intangible Cultural Heritage in the Asia-Pacific region, spoke about how crafts are a manifestation of systematic knowledge, and the efforts of UNESCO to put in place structural and institutional support for crafts. He said that India must learn from other countries and take greater steps to protect and advertise its diverse crafts.

Session 6: Panel Discussion – Yoga

The session on Yoga as Indian soft power was chaired by Dr. H. R. Nagendra, President, Vivekananda Yoga Anusandhana Samsthana (S-VYASA) and began with a presentation by Mr Gopi Kallayil, the Chief Evangelist of Brand Marketing at Google. He narrated his experience in bringing yoga, bhajans and kirtans to Google. He described how yoga has started to be used as a means of team building, and how it has found its way into numerous Google offices around the world, with many of them even sending employees to India for yoga retreats. Next, Ms Nouf Marwaai, a Padma Shri awardee, recounted her experiences as a child, where yoga helped her overcome numerous health issues. She was inspired by this power of yoga, and began to teach yoga in Saudi Arabia. In doing so she says that “Yoga has helped Indian and Saudis rediscover the bond that the two countries have shared since time immemorial”. The final presenter, Ms Suhag Shukla, Executive Director of the Hindu American Foundation, outlined the need for sharing yoga with others in a way that is relatable but at the same time does not delink yoga from Hindu thought and Indianness. She said this can be done through teaching people that yoga is more than just a set of asanas and that although it is a part of Hindu thought, you need not be Hindu to practice it.

Session 7: Presentation – Cinema

Mr. Bharat Bala, a film director, producer and screenwriter, presented on Indian cinema as a potent soft power tool. He gave the audience a first look into India Film Collective, a project that he is working on to disseminate the “untold story” of India through 100 short films. The audience viewed three such short films. Mr Bala said that film is a more powerful medium in telling narratives of India, than typical or traditional ways.

DAY III – 19th DECEMBER, 2018

Session 1: Panel Discussion – Ayurveda

The Panel Discussion on Ayurveda was chaired by Vaidya Rajesh Kotecha, Secretary, Ministry of Ayush, Government of India. The panel began with Dr Vasant Lad, Director of the Ayurvedic Institute in the USA, giving an account of his experiences in taking Ayurveda to the United States, and opening the Ayurvedic Institute in Albuquerque. Next, Dr Abhishek Joshi, an Ayurveda doctor at Universitas Hindu, Indonesia spoke about the long-standing link between India and Indonesia and how Ayurveda has had a large influence on the culture of Indonesia, and Bali in specific. He spoke about UsadaBali, an indigenous form of medicine practiced in Bali – and that the word “Usada” is in fact derived from Sanskrit word aushada meaning medicine. Next, Mr Rajiv Vasudevan, the Founder-CEO of AyurVAID, outlined how the personalised nature of Ayurveda can fill the void left by modern medicine, which is currently very impersonal. He said Western medicine treats symptoms and

not patients, unlike Ayurveda which focus on the specificities of each patient. Finally, Dr. Ramkumar Kutty, Co-founder of Punarnava Ayurveda in Coimbatore, emphasised the need to embrace Ayurveda within India before it can be properly harnessed and exported as an asset of Indian soft power.

Session 2: Panel Discussion – Education

The panel discussion on education was chaired by Prof. Sunaina Singh, Vice-chancellor, Nalanda University and Vice President, ICCR. The first panelists, Ms. Tatiana Shaumyan, Head, Centre for Indian Studies, Institute of Oriental Studies, Moscow expressed her gratitude to be discussing Indian soft power, as traditionally the only area of focus when studying Indian power has been hard power. Mr. Shaunaka Rishi Das, Director, Oxford Center for Hindu Studies, spoke about the universal nature of education as soft power, and how India can contribute by helping define new perspectives on not only what to think but also how to think. He also added that the success of Indian education globally is based on India’s own hard work, and that the onus lies on India to define how it is to be studied. Prof. Subhash Kak, Regents Professor, Oklahoma State University, spoke about the fundamental difference in current dominant global thought perspective and the Indian perspective, and how it is the Indian perspective that can take the world forward given the technological advancements that are underway. Prof. Ramdas Lamb, Professor, Department of Religion, University of Hawaii, outlined the need to ensure that courses on India should be restructured so as to allow for Indian culture to play a more dominant role in the classroom, including even teaching in Indian languages and not only English. Finally, Mr. Come Carpentier De Gourdon, Convener, Editorial Board, World Affairs Journal noted that the current policy is to resist the Indic or Bharatiya perspective. He stressed the need for an international alliance on education to clear misconceptions on India and Hinduism.

Session 3: Panel Discussion – Tourism

The session on “Tourism as Soft Power” was chaired by Ms. Anuradha Goyal, an author and founder of the blog, IndiTales. She began the session by pointing out tourism’s power in influencing the minds of people around the world, by providing them with shared experiences. Next, Mr Manish Sinha, Founder of Unhotel spoke on the power of tourism to take not only the essentials, but also the essence of a place, and translate it through a real story. He gave the example of a grandmother in New Delhi who has hosted people from over 60 countries, telling an authentic story of India,  and also added that it is the duty of every Indian to do their bit as a storyteller when promoting Indian soft power. Finally, Mr Nick Booker, Co-founder of IndoGenius, spoke about how bringing foreigners to India can challenge the outdated stereotypes of India that exist. He stressed the need to introduce people to the new India that is emerging in the era of technology and startups – one where India has become an intellectual superpower.

Session 4:  Panel Discussion – Spirituality

This panel discussion was chaired by Dr. David Frawley, Founder, American Institute of Vedic Studies, who spoke on how India is not a nation of just any spirituality, but rather is one defined by Dharmic traditions. He notes that this Dharmic tradition has now began to spread globally in many forms, and that this spread of Indic traditions has been India’s biggest source of soft power. Next, Ms. Dena Merriam, Author and Founder of the Global Peace Initiative of Women, Merriam recounted her story of when she first came to India, and how she came to be a Hindu. She spoke about the ongoing commercialisation of Dharma and how it needs to be stopped so as to not lose the essence of what

Dharma is, and eventually spirituality as Indian soft power. Next, Mr. Christopher Quilkey, Member of Editorial Board, Mountain Path, stated that moving forward in the realm of spirituality Hinduism must ask itself the question of, what does it do best? He spoke on the influence that Hinduism has had in every field of Indian life and even on other religions, and pointed out the need to ensure that this knowledge is transmitted to upcoming generations of people. Ven. Banagala Thero, President of the Mahabodhi Society, Sri Lanka, spoke on the historical influence India has had in the world, saying that Indian soft power stretches back to the days of Ashoka and Kanishka – when Indian word dharma was the single principle that defined the foundation of all Asian societies. Finally, Ms Maria Wirth, an author, spoke on the need for India to embrace the spiritual concepts that it has provided to the world, such as concepts of rebirth and Karma, that provide alternatives to western religious ideals and spoke of her own experiences of a German discovering Hinduism.

Session 5: Panel Discussion – Language & Literature

The final session of the Conference on Soft Power was “Language and Literature” that was chaired by Prof Makarand Paranjape, Director, Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, Shimla. He began the session by highlighting the immense impact that India has had on literature across history. He points out that India’s contributions have not only been in Indian languages, but that India has contributed vastly in areas of foreign literature such as English literature and Persian Literature. Prof. Paul Palmarozza, Director Sanskrit at St James spoke about the power of Sanskrit as one of the key elements of Indian soft power. He spoke about his experiences in bringing Sanskrit to the West through Sanskrit at St James where thousands of students have benefited from the knowledge of Sanskrit and Indian literature in the West. Prof. Chirapat Prapandvidya, Professor and Head of

Department of Sanskrit Studies, Silpakorn University at Thailand, spoke on the historical literary ties between India and Thailand. He spoke on the influence of Sanskrit on the local language of Pali, and of how Indian literature and stories influenced many of the works of local Thai writers and storytellers. Mr. Robert Arnett, an author, recounted his efforts in bringing his works which outlined stories about India to classrooms in the United States, so that students studying about India would get a more realistic perspective of what India is. He said India has to preserve its traditions and knowledge and not seek to emulate the West but rather serve as a model for them. Next, Paramacharya Sadasivanathaswami, Editor in Chief, Hinduism Today, Hawaii, spoke on his experience in bringing India and Indic thoughts into the literary mainstream through his work at Hinduism Today, and the struggles that they have faced in doing so. His presentation gave the audience a visual insight into Hinduism in the West and how India can use its spirituality as a soft power tool. Finally, Mr. Oscar Pujol, an Indologist from Spain, noted the fact that throughout history Sanskrit and Sanskrit literature had played an important role in defining the knowledge held by the world.

He pointed to a second renaissance for Sanskrit that took place in Europe, which influenced much of modern linguistics. He went on to say that there is a need for a third Sanskrit renaissance in the 21st century.

(This report is carried in the print edition of March-April 2019 issue of India Foundation Journal.)

 

 

Roundtable Discussions on Aspects of Soft Power

The build up to India Foundation’s inaugural conference on soft power was marked by a series of roundtable discussions, on each of the individual themes that were to be discussed at the conference – Arts, Crafts and Design; Ayurveda, Cinema, Cuisine, Language and Literature, Museums, Performing Arts, Spirituality, Tourism, Education and Yoga. The roundtables covered how a specific theme has to be presented and discussed at the conference with respect to its role in promoting Indian soft power.

The first roundtable to be held was the roundtable on Yoga, held on 23rd September, 2018, at Krishnamacharaya Yoga Mandiram, Chennai. The roundtable focused on how Yoga has become one of the most dominant Indian cultural exports in the modern world. The roundtable looked at how despite its apparent success, the popularity of yoga has some underlying issues – such as the commercialisation of Yoga. The participants focused on how India can properly leverage the global popularity of yoga for its own political and monetary gain. They also tried to address the problem of how India can accurately communicate the true essence of what yoga is to the world, to counteract the current, commercialised versions of yoga that exist abroad.

The roundtable on Performing Arts was held on 2nd October, 2018, at Lshva studio, Bangalore. The roundtable was attended by practitioners of numerous art forms, with the aim of determining means by which Indian performing arts can be successfully taken abroad. The participants stressed the importance of collaborative efforts between Indian and foreign artists as a way to make classical Indian art forms more initially relatable to foreign audiences. They also focused on how both government and private entities must take greater initiative in supporting Indian artists, both home and abroad, by facilitating them to perform at larger international venues and festivals.

The Roundtable on Ayurveda was held on 11th October, 2018, at India Foundation’s office in New Delhi. The roundtable examined some of the current obstacles that Ayurveda faces as it attempts to become recognised in foreign societies. The participants identified the need to create a singular narrative for Ayurveda that is echoed by all parties – government and private institutions – consistently. They also discussed the potential role that Ayurveda can play in such things as Japanese elder care, where it can serve as an alternative to existing western medicines.

The next roundtable was on the topic of Arts, Crafts and Design. The roundtable was held on on 13th October, 2018, in New Delhi. The roundtable looked at how Indian arts, crafts and design can properly tap into an ever growing global market. It focused on the growing trend towards organic and handmade materials and goods, and how Indian handicrafts are in the perfect space to take advantage of this trend.

The roundtable on Language and Literature was held on 16th October, 2018, at South Avenue, New Delhi. The roundtable looked at Indian soft power through the lens of India’s myriad of literature as well as through the lens of India’s multiple languages. The roundtable focused India’s contributions to literature in both indigenous and foreign languages. It also looked at how the teaching of Indian languages like Sanskrit can serve as a facet of Indian soft power, and how subsequently Sanskrit literature can serve as a doorway to wider Indian culture.

The Roundtable on Spirituality was organised on 21st October, 2018, at the Chinmaya Heritage Centre, Chennai. The roundtable looked to tackle the issue of how to communicate the core values of Indian spirituality effectively and accurately to a foreign audience.  The participants spoke of the need to ensure that Indian spirituality and its teachings are not warped or appropriated when sent abroad. They spoke on how Spirituality can serve as the perfect gateway to truly understand India and its culture, since spirituality lies at the heart of much of India’s culture.

The Roundtable on Tourism was held on 23rd October, 2018, at South Avenue, New Delhi. The roundtable noted India’s growing tourism sector as having the potential to become one of its most important soft power tools. The roundtable identified a number of solutions to address how to grow India’s tourism sector. The participants suggested measures such as streamlining the visa procedure and making the information more easily available, and creating promotional campaigns based on the testimonials of real tourists who have visited India.

The Roundtable on Cuisine was conducted on 23rd November, 2018, at South Avenue, New Delhi. The roundtable focused on issues facing Indian cuisine abroad. They highlighted problems, such as failures in marketing Indian food to foreign audiences, the outdated nature of Indian food abroad, and the failure of culinary schools in India to educate students on traditional Indian cooking techniques.

The participants looked to provide solutions to these problems, such as encouraging fusion between Indian and foreign cuisines, so as to act as a gateway to foreign audiences. They also suggested promoting not just food but also specific ingredients such as ghee and turmeric for their medicinal properties.

(This report is carried in the print edition of March-April 2019 issue of India Foundation Journal.)

 

Non-military Pre-emptive Strike

World community’s moral support to India for her air strike on terrorist camps across the LoC is the manifestation of bilateral and multilateral commitment of world powers to fight the menace of terrorism. It was neither aggression nor an offensive action; it was simply a preventive venture because the Jaish had more nefarious designs up its sleeve owing to the support it was receiving from the Generals of Pakistan army.

TheUS had conceded that India had the right to self-defence in the backdrop of Pulwama killings. It was a green signal.  Even PM Imran Khan wondered why India had delayed the retaliatory action. After all, he had repeatedly told the US that Pakistan was facing the challenge from terrorists.  He had recently said that he expected PM Modi to give peace a chance. Modi did not fail him and has given him an excellent chance by destroying Jaish terrorist camps not only in PoK but also 50 km away deep into Pakistan territory of Balakot in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. It will be reminded that Punjab CM Capt. Amrinder Singh had conveyed to Imran Khan that if he had problems in destroying terrorist camps, India would do it for him.  India has kept her promise and now it is Imran Khan who has to settle the score with his Army Generals.

The chance for him is to tell the Pakistani Generals that the world opinion, including that of China and the UN Security Council, is against allowing Pak territory to be used by the terrorists for hostile activity against a neighbouring county.  The IAF strike is bound to create fissures not only between the civilian government and the army and intelligence establishments of Pakistan but also within the civil society. The slogans of shame in the Pakistan national assembly were aimed at the defence establishment and not the PM and his government. Any retaliatory action by Pakistan will be certainly devoid of support from the civil society.

Pakistani civil society has already mounted criticism against the army for falsely manipulating Jhadav case in which the ICJ has put Pakistan to shame. Sections of Pakistani media had launched a severe criticism of Pakistan for feeding the civil society with utter falsehood about the case in which an India citizen kidnapped somewhere in Iran-Afghanistan region was paraded as a RAW agent. Pakistani civil society and sections of media have openly said that the Pakistani public and the world were fed with fabricated stories about this case.

What is of more importance to us is to assess the fallout of the air strike on Kashmir politics. It has dealt a very hard blow to pro-Pakistani and pro-Azadi elements including the entire Kashmiri mainstream political spectrum. They have to understand that when it concerns the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Indian State, then the might of the state comes into force. Sheikh Abdullah had to be isolated for nearly 12 long years. Because the deceptive and ambivalent Kashmir political leadership has been pampered for last so many decades by the Congress regimes, the day has come for Kashmiris to realize that they have to live in a realistic world. The Pulwama attack and now the IAF strike has exposed all so-called mainstream political stalwarts in Kashmir. Some of them are thinking which other flags they should carry on their shoulders after setting aside the Indian tricolour. Till yesterday their eyes were fixed on Pakistani flag and since this morning they have shifted the goalpost and are now looking for Chinese flag. This could be the best opportunity for New Delhi to announce abrogation of 35 A that has been clandestinely incorporated into the Constituting, But the government gives due respect to the Apex Court of the country.

Chinese exhortation to both India and Pakistan has a deeper meaning than what one may presume. It tells Pakistan to just survive so that she is able to return the mountain-high debts she owes to Beijing.

The deceptive Kashmir political leadership has found thatthe wind has been taken out of its sails. In utter frustration, one of them posed the question of whether Balakot, the terrorist site that has been razed to the ground is on the Indian side or Pakistani side. This shows how ill-informed this leader is about the geography of the area. For his information, the Balakot that had been made the main headquarter of the Jaish suicide bombers is part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 50 kilometres inside Pakistan territory in PK.

Army has already been given full powers to deal with terrorism in Kashmir Valley. Within just a few days, a large number of Kashmiri second rung leaders have silently expressed their support to any proactive measure by the government to eliminate insurgency. Conditions are highly favourable for the imposition of military rule in three infested districts of South Kashmir. The interned Jaish-e-Mohammedactivists are pulling strings to offer apologies and commitments to disassociate from JeM. In faithful pursuit of their traits of character, most of the hitherto pro-separatist groups will change their narrative and begin to sing eulogies of those who are going to eradicate the menace of militancy from Kashmir. It is a matter of time.

Realizing the political fallout of the IAF strike on domestic politics, the Congress President has come out in support of the strike. |Not only he, even the diehard critic of Modi government but Owaisi has also expressed his firm support to the action taken against terrorists based in the neighbouring country. Impetuous Farooq Abdullah cannot remain stuck to the fence. The entire political scenario in Kashmiris on the brink of going through a sea change. Like wounded jackals, the valley separatist leaders will retire to their hovels so that nobody sees them licking their wounds. Kashmir stands liberated from the skunk into which it had been dragged. Nobody has any objection to the Wahhabization and Salafization of Kashmirian Muslim society, Indian nation the least. The emancipated members among the OIC, realizing that Kashmiris were headed towards self-destruction, are seeking an assurance from Indian foreign minister that she would do all she can to pull them back from the brink of the abyss.

(Prof. K.N. Pandita is the former Director of the Centre of Central Asian Studies, Kashmir University, Srinagar. Views expressed are personal.)

 

World Community’s Rebuff to Pakistan

Nothing could be more farcical than the missive Pakistani foreign minister has sent to the UN Secretary-General Antonio Gutierrez on Monday last(18th February 2019) seeking his help to “reduce the tensions between the two countries”. Raising alarm over the threat of India attacking Pakistan, the foreign minister has, in his letter, alerted the UN Secretary-General that the security situation was fast declining in the region. He says that he writes with a sense of urgency. Interestingly, the foreign minister has underlined that the Pulwama suicide attack was “ostensibly and even by Indian accounts carried out by a Kashmiri resident.”  He goes on to argue that India has heightened tension to fulfil its domestic political agenda.

Handing out a veiled threat, the minister has, in his letter, alleged that India has hinted at abandoning the Indus Water Treaty, which would be a “grievous error”. He has urged the UN to step in and defuse the tension and that India should institute an open and credible investigation in the terror attack. He supplicates for UN intervention to prompt India for talks on Kashmir. And finally, he has requested the Secretary-General to circulate the copies of his letter among the members of the UN.

Before we try to dissect the contents of this bizarre letter, let us inform our readers what has been the reaction of the UN agencies on Pulwama suicide attack that has taken the lives of 44 CRP personnel and wounded others.

In a PTI despatch carried by the DNA of 22 February it is reported that on Thursday, the 15-member UN Security Council including China, condemned in the “strongest terms” the “heinous and cowardly” terror attack perpetrated by Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed in Pulwama and stressed on the need to hold organisers and financiers of such “reprehensible acts” accountable and bring them to justice. The press statement, issued by the most powerful UN body, names the Pakistan-based terror group headed by Masood Azhar. The press statement said,” “The members of the Security Council condemned in the strongest terms the heinous and cowardly suicide bombing in Jammu and Kashmir, which resulted in over 40 Indian paramilitary forces dead and dozens wounded on February 14, 2019, for which Jaish-e-Mohammed has claimed responsibility.” It further said, “The members of the Security Council underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of these reprehensible acts of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice, and urged all States, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant Security Council resolutions, to cooperate actively with the Government of India and all other relevant authorities in this regard,

This categorical statement of the Security Council has come a day after the letter of the Pakistani foreign minister was delivered to the UN Secretary General. The condemnation by the UNSC comes just a day after Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the UN Maleeha Lodhi met top UN leaders, including with Secretary-General Antonio Gutierrez and the Security Council President Anatolio Ndong Mba, briefing them about  what she claimed “escalating tensions in the region in the wake of the Pulwama attack.”

Let us revert to the letter of Pakistani foreign minister and expose his frustration and an attempt of hiding behind a plethora of falsehood. What need has India for providing a proof of involvement of Pakistan in the attack when Jaish-e-Muhammad, the UN designated organization publicly claimed that it was behind the attack. Neither the Pakistan government nor any Pakistani intelligence agency repudiated the claim of Jaish. And the Jaish, based in Bahawalpur, Pakistan, is fondly patronized by the ISI and Pakistan army. Secondly, India produced a plethora of evidence in the Mumbai attack and Pakistan evaded action. It even disowned Kasab and declined to accept his dead body after he was executed.

As far as the creation of tension, this is precisely what India has been saying and proving that suicide bombers and infiltrators are sent from across the border to disrupt peace in Kashmir. The tension in the region is the handiwork of Pakistani jihadis raised as the front-line strike force against India. And there is not only the Jaish but so many known and unknown terrorist groups who change their nomenclature as the situation demands. What is Salahu’d Din the chief of United Jihad Front doing in Rawalpindi? What has Pakistan to say about the intercepted conversation between him and late Burhan Wani?

Four times resolutions were moved in the Security Council to designate the Jaish chief Azhar as the international terrorist. Every time China opposed it. Why is it so? The answer is that China encourages anti-India adventurism of Pakistani jihadi organizations while it imposes all conceivable restrictions of Uighur Islamists in its eastern province of Xinjiang. China has already extracted a commitment from Pakistan that its terrorist organizations will not admit Uighur rebels in its training camps for training in terrorism. Following that commitment, China imposed most reprehensible restrictions on the Uighur Sunni population of Xinjiang in performing their religious duties and Pakistani fanatics remain tongue-tied.  Obviously, China promotes terrorism abroad while maintaining a strict vigil against it at home.

Pakistani foreign minister has talked about India intending to walk away from Indus Water Treaty. In the first place, India has never said anything of that sort and knowing that Nehru had shown unwarranted generosity to Pakistan in that treaty, India did not oppose it in any way all these years. Not only that, Pakistan dragged India to the International Court and World Bank several times alleging Indiahad violated the Indus Treaty, India just took recourse to the legalities of the case and never hinted at revanchist stance. Therefore Pakistan’s allegations are nothing more than a figment of imagination.

However, it will be reminded that Pakistan broke the commitment made to the UN by signing the Security Council 1948 Resolution on Kashmir. Pakistan broke the commitment made in Shimla Agreement that it will solve Kashmir issue through bilateral talks and shun violence. Against this, Pakistan raised Kashmir issue again andagain at the UN and other world fora. Not only that, frustrated on its failure to grab Kashmir, it sponsored a proxy war in 1990 in Kashmir of which Pulwama suicide attack is a part. The point is that if Pakistan feels she has a right to break commitments with international ramifications, she will have to concede the same rights to India in the case of Indus Water Treaty, which in no way is of scriptural sanctity not to be rescinded.

And finally, as regards the alleged threat India is posing to Pakistan in the words of her foreign minister, the fact is that Pakistan is indeed faced with dire threat certainly and unquestionably not from India but from its own people against whom it has adopted discriminatory treatment and most repressive and oppressive policies. Pakistan, to be precise, the Pakistani Punjabis are face to face with the threat from the Baloch, the Sindhis, thePashtoons, the Kashmiris of PoK and the entire people of Gilgit and Baltistan. India and the entire world stand for democratic and secular values for all communities especially the minorities in any part of the world.

The comity of nations is geared to meeting the threats to the world society posed by the powerhouse of terrorism in Pakistan. Very soon, France is going to table a resolution in the Security Council asking to declare Mas’ud Azhar as an international terrorist. This will be a befitting reply of the Security Council and the world community to the letter which the Pakistani foreign minister dispatched to the UN Secretary General in an act of bravado.

(Prof. K.N. Pandita is the former Director of the Centre of Central Asian Studies, Kashmir University, Srinagar.)

 

Conference on Soft Power

[wpc_countdown theme=”flat-colors” now=”1542092027465″ end=”816″ bg=”#fff” padding=”5″]

Dates: December 17-19, 2018

Venue: New Delhi

Download Brochure

Given the greater role that soft power is starting to play in India’s foreign policy, the Center for Soft Power is hosting its inaugural ‘Conference on Soft Power’, in collaboration with the Indian Council for Cultural Relations (ICCR). The Center on Public Diplomacy of the University of Southern California, and Nalanda University, Rajgir, are the primary academic partners of the conference. The aim of the conference is to bring together academicians, practioners, experts, policy makers and diplomats to deliberate and discuss Indian soft power. Branding of nations, Digital storytelling, Theoretical perspectives and Indian soft power accross multiple verticals – Ayurveda, Cinema, Cuisine, Arts crafts and Design, Language, Literature,  Museums, Performing Arts, Spirituality, Tourism, education, and Yoga – will be discussed at the conference.

Please fill out this form to express your interest in attending the Conference in New Delhi between 17 and 19 December 2018. Please note that access to the Conference will be restricted to confirmed delegated only.

Registration Form

[wpforms id=”4907″ title=”true” description=”true”]

ASEAN-India: Youth and Socio-Cultural Connectivity

Young individuals are one of the foremost assets in India and Southeast Asia because they symbolise the potential for the future. The role of Youth in Nation-building process becomes even much more important in 21st Century when India and Southeast Asia are positioning themselves internationally as innovative, creative, inventive and disruptive economies, with an outward looking market-based approach along with philosophical principles of inclusiveness, admiration and respect for diversity and willingness to change for the better. In a time of constantly developing technological machineries and rapidly transforming economic, social as well as political realities, young generation in India and Southeast Asia is among the most advanced as compared to any developing region or country so as to help in contributing for the innovative solutions to solve issues or problems in future that humanity is facing in 21st century. In today’s time, societies in India and Southeast Asia need the contribution of young and dynamic minds in the form of transformative ideas, passionate enthusiasm and a forward-looking vision to resolving problems and challenges in today’s era.

India’s ties with countries in Southeast Asia has a strong foundation of cultural linkages and civilisational ties which is noticeable in the cultural resemblances in many aspects and it has been the bedrock for building the platform for the new emerging areas of cooperation. As stated by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in one of his speeches, the ancient Indian epic Ramayana remains a shared cultural heritage between India and Southeast Asia, along with the unique links established by Buddhism and Islam which has travelled from India to Southeast Asian countries through many centuries. Today, the Socio-cultural connectivity includes cooperation between India and ASEAN in terms of people-to-people exchanges, development of human resources, science and technology, education, health, small and medium enterprises, tourism, information & communication technology and climate change etc.

India and ASEAN have been actively involved in various capacity building projects for Youths. The Indian diaspora in Southeast Asian countries has also played a very important role in cementing the youth and socio-cultural connectivity between India and Southeast Asia. These inter-cultural linkages need to be highlighted further because such links are critical in connecting the similarities of culture and bridging the diversity of culture between India and ASEAN. Spiritual tourism offers enormous opportunity to build socio-cultural connectivity between India and Southeast Asia. Buddhist Tourist Circuit which connects Bodhgaya and Rajgir in the state of Bihar, Kushinagar, Sarnath and Shravasti in the state of Uttar Pradesh and Sanchi in Madhya Pradesh has the potential to become a hallmark of connectivity through spiritual tourism promoting socio-cultural connectivity among the people of India and Southeast Asia.

The young generation of today’s time will certainly get an opportunity to play a leading role in their respective countries, either at political or in different capacities, but the youth will be the future. Therefore, nurturing youth cooperation between India and Southeast Asia will naturally lead to better gains in the longer run for the entire region because India and Southeast Asia stand on the edge of entering into a new era of development and cooperation, the vital key to which lies in the mutual partnership among their youth population. If the potential of young generation is harnessed and channelised in a structured way, then the youth can help ushering in a brighter future.

To promote greater awareness and appreciation of traditions, heritage and cultures of India and Southeast Asia in each other’s country, including through organising cultural & cuisine festivals and discuss & exchange experiences on preserving traditional cultural values, India Foundation in collaboration with Ministry of External Affairs, Govt of India, initiated a platform of ASEAN-India Youth Summit. This platform brings the young minds from India and ASEAN together, to promote youth exchanges in order to enable them to harness the significant contribution which young people can make in their respective countries. The platform of Youth Summit is also helpful in exchanging and sharing experiences among ASEAN member states and India on various issues related to youth and socio-cultural connectivity and also for identifying future areas of co-operation. With socio-cultural linkages as the foundation, India Foundation’s 2nd ASEAN-India Youth Summit will have deliberations on “Youth and Socio-cultural Connectivity,” so as to evolve a partnership among youth for progress and prosperity.

ASEAN-India: Governance & Polity

Governance off late has become a ‘buzz’ word. Governance in essence refers to all processes of governing whether undertaken by a Government or any other organisation or agency through language, laws norms or power. Studies and discussions on governance have also varied around different subjects, such as international relations, public policy, law, polity etc.

As per the United Nations Development Programme , good governance can be characterised as follows:
• transparent – free flow of information is guaranteed; processes and institutions are directly accessible to those concerned with them;
• accountable – decision-makers in government, the private sector and civil society organisations are accountable to the public, as well as to institutional stakeholders;
• based on the rule of law — legal frameworks are fair and enforced impartially;
• efficient and effective — processes and institutions produce outcomes that meet needs while making the best use of resources; and
• participatory – differing interests are mediated and broad consensus is reached on political, social and economic priorities

The Commission on Global Governance, a think group, noted in its report submitted to the United Nations that is only a responsive and credible leadership that can catalyse governance in any country “Whatever the dimensions of global governance, however renewed and enlarged its machinery, whatever values give it content, the quality of global governance depends ultimately on leadership. It needs leadership that is proactive, not simply reactive, that is inspired, not simply functional, that looks to the longer term and future generations for whom the present is held in trust. ”

Therefore, the discernible interconnectedness between polity and governance is key in fulfilling the larger objective of regional cohesion and integration between the ASEAN member countries. It is also imperative to know what truly the ingredients of the envisaged political leadership are. For instance, Singapore has premised its political leadership on three pillars, namely, accountability and transparency, long-term social orientation, and social justice. Within the ASEAN member countries, consensus and consultative leadership decision have led to envisioning region specific economic integration.

Good governance and growth go together. The ASEAN region is also known for not making too many volatile policy surprises. In one sampling of some 3,600 firms worldwide made by the World Bank in 1996, less than 30 percent of entrepreneurs were worried about policy surprises in Southeast Asia . This continuum has also led to faster growth; a period between 1990-98 the robustness of the respective economies was such that the ASEAN countries ended up overtaking the OECD countries.

This economic growth and financial confidence has resulted in the creation of a socio-economic situation in ASEAN states that mirrors that of India. Shifting from an agrarian and primary sector dominated economy to one driven by services, large scale urban migration, smoother class mobility, and exponential technological advancement are some of the socio-political trends that have shaped the demographics of the ASEAN over the last few decades. Much like India, this increased economic strength has resulted in the creation of a new paradigm in ASEAN states, with citizens now demanding better and more accountable governance from their leaders. In this sense, India and the ASEAN are in the unique position to collaborate so as to create new and innovative methods of governance to address the concerns of populations that are growing in both size and wealth.

Analysts and observers have noted that the ASEAN countries have many effective checks and balances on the actions of political leaders. To begin with, the form of state varies from the Philippines’ presidential democracy to the parliamentary systems of Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia. Thailand and Malaysia are constitutional monarchies, but Malaysia also has a federal structure, which gives it a veto point. Thailand’s monarchy has been key to ensuring some political continuity, in the face of recurrent changes in its civilian government.

Beyond these formal checks, governance in the ASEAN must also address the field of civil society. Civil society not only offers an effective check on the power of governments, but is also essential to the thriving of a political structure. In 2018, the ASEAN Foundation, in partnership with Temasek Foundation Connects held the 3rd S. Rajaratnam Endowment (SRE) – ASEAN Community Forum (SRE-ACF) series. “The 3rd SRE–ASEAN Community Forum serves as a strategic platform to embrace CSOs (civil society organisations) to deepen their knowledge and understanding about the ASEAN Community Blueprints 2025 and explore how their roles can contribute to achieving the ASEAN community goals. We hope that the work plans that they develop here in the forum can add value to their work and make their initiatives more impactful, ” said Ms Elaine Tan, Executive Director of the ASEAN Foundation. Given the sheer size and complexity of India’s civil society, it is clear that there exists scope for collaboration between India and ASEAN regarding questions on the role of civil society organisations in governance.

While ASEAN has historically exhibited a high level of good governance, there is a need to adapt the political structure to a changing paradigm. As this paradigm continues to mirror that of India’s, there is an opportunity for the two to strengthen their relationship in the field of governance. Free exchange of ideas and interaction of institutions between the two regions would ensure the creation of new and innovative ideas aimed at tackling the political needs of both regions.

Bibliography

United Nations Development Programme. “Discussion Paper: Governance for Sustainable Development Integrating Governance in the Post-2015 Development Framework,” March 2014. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Democratic%20Governance/Discussion-Paper–Governance-for-Sustainable-Development.pdf.

The Commission on Global Governance. Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. 1 edition. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Marilou Uy. “Financial Markets, Public Polict and the East Asian Miracle.” The World Bank Research Observer 11, no. 2 (August 1996): 249–76.

“Mobilising Civil Society Leaders across ASEAN for Greater Regional Integration.” Association of South East Asian Nations (blog), March 14, 2018. https://asean.org/mobilising-civil-society-leaders-across-asean-for-greater-regional-integration/.

i) United Nations Development Programme, “Discussion Paper: Governance for Sustainable Development Integrating Governance in the Post-2015 Development Framework.”
ii) The Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood.
iii) Stiglitz and Uy, “Financial Markets, Public Polict and the East Asian Miracle.”
iv) “Mobilising Civil Society Leaders across ASEAN for Greater Regional Integration.”

ASEAN-India: Entrepreneurship and Skill Development

Different methodologies aside, which only result in minor variations, it would be correct to state that a pie chart representing the Indian economy would be a highly disproportional one vis-à-vis the three main sectors of the economy and the number of people dependent on them. The agricultural sector for instance, is a space that employs more than 50 percent of the total workforce but contributes only 17-18 percent to the country’s GDP. On the other hand, the service sector accounts for nearly 53-54 percent of the country’s GDP that has only about 30 percent of the workforce employed in it.[1] This mismatch, notwithstanding a mostly stagnant manufacturing sector in spite of many a policy push, creates an urgent need for encouraging new businesses, entrepreneurs and skilling (re-skilling where applicable) the predominantly rural workforce of India. Another important factor one needs to take into account to fully understand the social ramifications this disproportional structure of the Indian economy causes, is the fact that during all the years post the economic reforms of 1991, India has been the fastest growing major economy in the world. Thus, in practice, this has resulted in an ever-growing gap between farm incomes and incomes derived from the tertiary sector. This elevated growth is abetting a large-scale migration of workers from farms to factories. The shift from agriculture-based jobs to jobs in the service industry requires a certain formal acquisition of knowledge and quality tertiary education is still a dream for many due to the low penetration of higher education among the majority of the population.

To approach the issue of highlighting the importance of entrepreneurship and skill development in this context, one has to also look at the technological transitions in place today. Machine learning, artificial intelligence and cost efficient robotics are rendering many current jobs/roles redundant. As the division of labour between humans and machines finds a new equilibrium, scaling up skill sets of over 300 million workers and training 100 million new hands to keep up with technological transitions is a mammoth task. This is only possible through re-skilling the workforce and incentivising individuals to look for new avenues beyond the ambit of current traditional businesses and job offerings. Relevant technical and vocational skills need to be imparted and public-private partnerships need to be fostered to achieve this task.

Perhaps the one area where India can outpace other nations in this ‘New Industrial Revolution’ is by building on its competitive edge of an upcoming massive demographic dividend with the majority of the workforce being under the age of 30 with the average age of the country expected to be 29 by the year 2026[2]. This, coupled with the fact that India will soon be the most populous country in the world, makes for an interesting dynamic. Even today, India has one of the largest workforces in the world. The best case for India is therefore to spruce up its comparative advantage and churn out a smart, skilled workforce which is in sync with the requirements of a new global economic order. Traditional knowledge needs to be monetised and inherent acquired strengths need to be leveraged by investments in a knowledge based economy leading to sustained smart skill sets. In the last five years, numerous pro-business reforms and prudent policy steps have been taken in this direction by the government and India Inc.

For the sake of simplicity, we shall only take examples and ramifications of a few initiatives, namely, Startup India, Standup India and Skill India. These campaigns, initiated by the Government of India in partnership with institutional stakeholders and private players, aim to prepare and encourage young Indians to look for employment in avenues previously considered ‘safe’ only for the 1 percent. With an initial pool of 100 billion rupees and an additional pledge of USD 10 billion by Japanese firm SoftBank, Startup India is incubating startups in the country by offering various incentives like fewer inspections, tax sops for the first 3 years, easy 90 day exit window and under Standup India enabling women entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs from the backward classes distinct benefits in uplifting themselves and also promoting India as a start-up hub across the world. As collaterals, patent fees have been slashed and innovation is being encouraged under the overall aegis of the Atal Innovation Mission. Skill India, on the other hand, aims to train over 400 million people in India in different skills by 2022. Many initiatives of the government have been clubbed under the Skill India Mission with partnerships from all spheres. The United Kingdom too has entered into a partnership with India under this scheme and virtual partnerships will be initiated at the school level to enable young people to experience the school system of another country and also develop an understanding of the culture, traditions and social and family systems. In the annual budget of 2017-18, 170 billion rupees were allocated to the Skill India Mission. The first of its kind, public-private-partnership company, The National Skill Development Corporation India was also created with the mandate of catalysing the skill development landscape in India.

As a result, India has moved up to number 77 in the Ease of Doing Business Index, a major improvement in rankings in recent times and bettered its ranking in the Global Innovation Index by moving up five places to number 57 in a list of 126 nations. Clubbed with various other initiatives and schemes, and a rich pool of English speaking engineers, doctors, researchers, businesses and scientists, global optimism in the Indian economy has been re-enforced and investor confidence improved. Broadening the bandwidth of these knowledge factories and the structural strengthening of India’s economy to the benefit of small and medium sized enterprises, that are not only job creating centres but also drivers of economic growth, is the need of the hour. Furthermore, partnerships in this area with other strategic partners like the ASEAN countries needs to be pursued, for together India and ASEAN make up about 30 percent of the world’s population and have a combined GDP might of around USD 5 trillion.

Bibliography

Economic Survey 2017-18, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, January 2018.

IMF Working Paper: The Demographic Dividend: Evidence from the Indian States; Shekhar Aiyar and Ashoka Mody; International Monetary Fund; February 2011.

ASEAN-India: Cultural and Historical Linkages

In 1927, one of the greatest architects of modern India, Rabindranath Tagore undertook an intellectual pilgrimage to south-east Asia. The prolific writer expressed his intent, ‘We have embarked on this pilgrimage to see the signs of the history of India’s entry into the universal.’

Almost a century ago from today, Tagore had realised the necessity to rekindle India’s historical cultural exchanges with the Swarnabhumi or the Golden land of lore. Analogously, when Government of India announced its Act East Policy in 2014, the underscoring principle was decided ‘Connectivity, Culture, and Commerce,’ placing cross-cultural interactions at the forefront of India’s foreign policy agenda. Invoking the same commitment, Indian Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi, in the Shangri La Dialogue 2018, spoke of the forbearing cultural ties between our nations and our long history of shared civilisational ethos—of pluralism, co-existence, openness and dialogue.

As we traverse through history, we realise PM Modi was not off the mark. Our part of the world was largely contiguous and borderless in the pre-colonial era. Courtesy our unfragmented geography and common values of peaceful assimilation of diversity, we became inheritors of a shared legacy in linguistics, literature, performing arts and fine arts, textiles, architecture, and even our religious customs, imprints of which are discernible till date.

A felicitous example of our symbiotic exchanges is the proliferation and adoption of the great Indian epic—Ramayana—across the geography of south-east Asia. Contextualised and localised by artists, Ramayana came to be known as Yama Zatdaw in Myanmar, RamKer in Cambodia, Ramakien in Thailand, and Hikayat Seri Rama in Malaysia, all of which became major influences on the culture, art, and the collective psyche of the respective people.

Interestingly, well into the 21st century, these influences continue to manifest in traditional practices across the region. For instance, the Thai king is still referred to as Rama, where he is considered a reincarnation of the Hindu God Vishnu. Wayang or traditional puppet theatres of south-east Asia are still famous for depicting scenes from Indian epics of Mahabharata and Ramayana.

These exchanges, however, have always been coactive or two-way. As Indian emperors sent out Buddhist monks and state emissaries to Southeast Asia to propagate Buddhism, monks from the region travelled to India to gain admission to Indian monasteries in the ancient Indian cities of Nalanda, Bodhgaya and Sarnath (Varanasi). The flow of monks to Indian monasteries remains unbridled even today. Other aspects of Indian culture have been affected too. For instance, the matrilineal society of Khasis in Meghalaya, India, echoes the traditional matriarchal society of Sumatra (Minangkabau), Indonesia where women are head of the family and inheritance is through the daughters’ lineage.

We must acknowledge that an extensive trade network within the Southeast Asian region had been the catalyst for these cultural exchanges. Tamralipti, an ancient Indian city in the Bay of Bengal, was a busy centre of maritime trade as far back as the 1st century. Coins from the Gupta dynasty of the 4th-6th century have been discovered as far as the Malay Peninsula. The expanse of the Chola Kingdom under Rajendra Chola I of the 11th century, known for boosting maritime trade in the region, had spread till the modern day state of Kedah in Malaysia. Even the spread of Islam in Indonesia and Malaysia can be traced to traders originating from the Indian state of Gujarat, or merchants from Arab nations who found their way to South East Asia through India.

In addition to augmenting the spread of religion, thriving trade led to an emergence of novel architectural styles which had both Indian influences and unique regional characteristics. In central Thailand, evidence of Indian influence is found through Dvaravati form of representing the Buddha which is derived from the Indian Amaravati and Gupta styles. In Cham, in southern Vietnam, there is evidence of extensive influence of Indian architecture through many ancient Shiva temples. The Prambanan, a UNESCO world heritage site in Yogyakarta, Indonesia was built in the Hindu architectural style in the 9th century as a tribute to God Shiva. Built in the same century is the Borobudur Mahayana Buddhist Temple in Central Java, the world’s largest Buddhist temple and Indonesia’s single most visited tourist attraction which demonstrates a heavy influence of Gupta art. The 12th century Angkor Wat in Cambodia, built in the local Khmer style architecture, originally known as Vrah Visnuloka remains the largest Hindu temple in the world.

Additionally, the domino effect of the spread of Indic religions was the tremendous influence on South Asian languages. Sanskrit and Pali (originated in India) became official languages in the court of Thai kings as early as in 7th century and remained so till the 13th century. The ancient kingdom of Srivijaya, on the islands of Sumatra, which became the nucleus for trade and spread of Buddhism in Malay Peninsula and Indonesia, borrowed its name from Sanskrit. Mon-Khmer the large language family of mainland south-east Asia bear a heavy influence of both Sanskrit and Pali and inscriptions on stones in both these languages continue to be discovered till date, as far as in Indonesia and Vietnam. In addition to Sanskrit and Pali clusters of Tamil inscriptions have also been found on the eastern fringes of the Indian Ocean from Burma to Sumatra.

The city of Bagan in Central Myanmar, a centre for religious and secular studies, specialising in Pali scholarship as well as prosody, phonology, grammar, astrology, alchemy, medicine, and legal studies is known to have attracted monks and students from as far as India, Sri Lanka and the Khmer Empire in Cambodia. Such intermingling of ideas could have been possible only because of the cosmopolitan nature of our society in ancient times.

Today, in a world of sealed borders and trade wars, a world of religious terrorism and ethnic conflicts, history bestows on us a magnificent torch of plurality and inclusiveness to uphold. Deriving inspiration from Tagore again, we hope ‘this torch that India and ASEAN will carry together on their path to progress will converge to illuminate the common ray of knowledge for the entire world.’

Bibliography

Bose, Sugata. “Rabindranath Tagore: at Home in the World.” The Indian Express, The Indian Express, 18 May 2010, indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/rabindranath-tagore-at-home-in-the-world/.

Jayshree Sengupta +91 011 35332000. “Jayshree Sengupta | Indian Economy | BRICS | Women and Development.” ORF, www.orfonline.org/people-expert/jayshree-sengupta/.

Lieberman, Victor B. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, volume 1, Integration on the Mainland. Cambridge University Press.

Prabhune, Tushar. “Gujarat Helped Establish Islam in SE Asia – Times of India.” The Times of India, Business, 27 Dec. 2011, timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/ampnbspGujarat-helped-establish-Islam-in-SE-Asia/articleshow/11262585.cms.

Sanyal, Sanjeev. The Ocean of Churn. Eka, 2018.

Saran, Shyam. Cultural and Civilisational Links between India and Southeast Asia: Historical and Contemporary Dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

i Saran, Shyam. Cultural and Civilisational Links between India and Southeast Asia: Historical and Contemporary Dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
ii Sanyal, Sanjeev. The Ocean of Churn. Eka, 2018.
iii Prabhune, Tushar. “Gujarat Helped Establish Islam in SE Asia – Times of India.” The Times of India, Business, 27 Dec. 2011, timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/ampnbspGujarat-helped-establish-Islam-in-SE-Asia/articleshow/11262585.cms.
iv Saran, Shyam. Cultural and Civilisational Links between India and Southeast Asia: Historical and Contemporary Dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
v Lieberman, Victor B. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, volume 1, Integration on the Mainland. Cambridge University Press.

Explide
Drag