Focus Theme: One Year of Change
Felicitation Programme for H.E. Shri Maithripala Sirisena
India Foundation hosted a felicitation programme for H.E. Shri Maithripala Sirisena, the Hon’ble President of Sri Lanka on May 13, 2016 at the Hotel ITC Maurya, New Delhi. The event was graced by the presence of many eminent leaders like Shri Dharmendra Pradhan, Minister of State (IC) for Petroleum and Natural Gas; Shri Jitendra Singh, Minister of State (IC) for Development of North Eastern Region and former MPs and Ambassadors.
The representatives of India Foundation pointed out that under the leadership of President Maithripala Sirisena the longstanding relationship between India and Sri Lanka has entered into a new path while further strengthening it.
Discussion on “The Future of Asian Renaissance”
India Foundation hosted Mr. George Yeo, Former Foreign Minister of Govt. of Singapore and Chancellor of Nalanda University on 14th April, 2016. Mr. Yeo spoke on“the Future of Asian Renaissance”. Shri MJ Akbar, MP (Rajya Sabha) & Director, India Foundation in his welcome said that he was glad that Mr. Yeo was the Chancellor of Nalanda University and hoped that under his stewardship the institution would grow into one of the great institutions of the world.
Mr. George Yeo thanked India Foundation for inviting him for the interaction. He started by saying that Singapore’s future was between India and China and therefore relations between China and India matter a lot for Singapore. He said that China was expected to be the biggest economy in the world and that the USA or India would hold the second position. He saw a great future for Singapore and ASEAN in the growth of China. He spoke positively about the One Belt One Road (OBOR) policy being pursued by China. He felt that China was the power station of Asia and that if triggered, could give one hell of a shock. He said that the 1962 war between India and China was seen in India as a scar which was yet to heal whereas in China it was almost forgotten. He said that China’s relations with Pakistan were definitely a matter of concern for India. He said that Myanmar would never take a stand against China but would want to serve their own interest through their relations with China in matters of trade, investment etc. He said that all South East Asian countries wanted to develop good relations with the two powerful South Asian Countries – China and India.
Mr. Yeo talked about the importance of ASEAN and how ASEAN could be used to turn the individual weaknesses of the South East Asian countries into their collective strength. He said that friendly relations between India and China would lead to a powerful South East Asia. He said that Buddhism in China was seen as a native religion i.e., a Chinese religion even though the people of china were aware of the fact that Buddhism originated in India. He opined that Buddhism softened Chinese civilization. He reminded the audience that the Indian PM Narendra Modi during his China visit in May 2015, made it a point to visit Wild Goose Pagoda, which was built in recognition of the seventeen year long journey of Xuanzang (Hsuan-tsang in the old spelling) to India in the 7th Century CE and his efforts to popularize Buddhism in China. He was of the opinion that the presence of India’s past in China’s present would hold a lot of significance for both the countries.
Mr. Rajiv Sikri, former Ambassador observed that Chinese one belt one road policy is not a benign one. Referring to Chinese extra-territorial claim, he said that if historical reasons could be used as excuses, Turkey should be claiming whole of Arab world. He felt that there would be competition between China and India in ASEAN region. Mr. Manvendra Singh, BJP Leader and Mr. P. Stobdan, former ambassador also spoke. Mr. M.J. Akbar, MP (Rajya Sabha) summed up by saying India and China are mature enough as nations and confident enough to deal with and sort out outstanding issues. Prof. Lokesh Chandra, Chairman, ICCR presented a memento to George Yeo.
What Dalits want
~ By Ram Madhav Varanasi
In 1947, we opted for democracy as our political system post-Independence. “Democracy was something that would give the weak the same chance as the strong,” explained Mahatma Gandhi. Like many other democracies in the world, the three famous principles of the French Revolution — liberty, equality and fraternity — have inspired us too. Liberty we secured through a prolonged political struggle; equality we secured through our Constitution. But what about the third?
Bhimrao Ambedkar, the architect of our Constitution had said that his inspiration for liberty, equality and fraternity was Bhagwan Buddha. “What does fraternity mean?” he asked and went on to explain, “Fraternity means a sense of common brotherhood of all Indians — of Indians being one people. It is the principle that gives unity and solidarity to social life”.
Fraternity can’t be achieved through rules and laws in the Constitution. It requires a persistent education of the people through public and private initiatives. In the last seven decades, have we been able to achieve what Ambedkar had described as fraternity?
Indian society is divided into castes and sub-castes. One single biggest challenge to fraternity today is the hierarchical caste system. Its roots are no doubt very deep. But its distorted and utterly discriminatory manifestation today has no sanction in any Hindu dharmashastras.
“Janmana jatih” — caste by birth — is what we practise as the caste system. Although it had its roots in the varnashrama system of ancient times, the varnashrama system never sanctioned any caste hierarchy; nor did it allow any discrimination. In fact, transmigration was said to be the order of the day in that ancient system.
“Ajyestaaso akanistaasa yete — sam bhraataro vaavrudhuh soubhagaya (No one is superior or inferior; all are brothers; all should strive for the interest of all and progress collectively),” proclaims the Rigveda (Mandala 5, Sukta 60, Mantra 5).
But the present-day caste system defies its own great scriptural wisdom and knowledge. It defies our Constitution in that it stands as a stumbling block in achieving fraternity in society. In a way, it has outlived its utility. The varnashrama system had depended on guna and karma — aptitudes and actions — in positioning a person in a varna. Today’s caste system has no connection with the old system. Hence, it should go lock, stock and barrel.
However, caste has not remained just a system. It got entrenched as an identity. Identities are not easy to erase. There is a need to find innovative ways to tackle this identity question.
Pending that, we shouldn’t lose sight of the immediate. The immediate issue is about discrimination based on caste. Article 17 of our Constitution has effectively and fully sought to abolish untouchability and enforcing any disability on the basis of so-called low and high caste discrimination. Towards that end, we have also promulgated the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955, which made the offence of violating Article 17 punishable.
But has it really ended discrimination? Why is a Dalit, however well-educated and well-placed he may be, forced to hide his identity? Why is it that a leader from among Dalits is always seen only as a “Dalit leader”, which is not the case with other leaders? Hierarchical casteism is entrenched in the social psyche, and that is where the battle is.
Today, we are living in an era of caste assertion. In order for social unity and harmony to be well-maintained, we need to keep the discourse on track. In the mid-1990s, a Dalit sub-caste in Andhra Pradesh started using their caste name as a suffix to their names. This, in their view, was a proud assertion of their identity. This act led to serious discussion among the intelligentsia. Many were worried that casteism was staging a comeback. But a simple and profound question asked by a Dalit intellectual put the discussion to rest. In Andhra, people belonging to several non-Dalit castes use their caste name as a suffix. This has been the practice for long. Never did the question of growing casteism arise when Sharma or Shastry or Reddy was used as a suffix. Why this concern when a Dalit does the same?
This calls for a deeper understanding of the discourse within caste groups. For political correctness, one may declare that there is no discrimination in Hinduism and that a Dalit has an equal right to study the Vedas and become on par with a Brahmin. But the question a Dalit will ask is about this notion of “on par”. Why can’t it be that a Dalit reads the Vedas and still remains what he is? Why should he be doing it in order to become “on par” with some other caste?
This is the real discourse that we need to address. We assume that the Dalit discourse is all about more reservations and more jobs. No doubt, reservations are important and so are jobs. But the hunger today is for four things: Samman (respect and dignity), sahbhagita (participation and partnership), samriddhi (progress and prosperity) and, finally, satta (empowerment).
The government can take care of the last two, but the first two are the responsibility of society. Social and religious organisations have to take responsibility for addressing the Dalit hunger for samman and sahbhagita. That is when social equality is achieved.
Ambedkar was right when he warned the nation about it. “On the 26th of January 1950, we are going to enter into a life of contradictions. In politics we will have equality and in social and economic life we will have inequality. In politics we will be recognising the principle of one man one vote and one vote one value. In our social and economic life, we shall, by reason of our social and economic structure, continue to deny the principle of one man one value.
How long shall we continue to live this life of contradictions? How long shall we continue to deny equality in our social and economic life? If we continue to deny it for long, we will do so only by putting our political democracy in peril.”
Ram Madhav Varanasi is the General Secretary of Bhartiya Janata Party and the Director of India Foundation. The views expressed are his own.
(Disclaimer : This article first appeared in The Indian Express)
Bilateral Discussion with USIBC Delegation
India Foundation and the US India Business Council held bilateral discussions on 7th April 2016 at Villa Medici, Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.
Welcoming the USIBC delegation on behalf of India Foundation, Shri Shakti Sinha, Director, said that in the context of an uncertain global economy that shows no signs of recovery, India looks towards foreign investment to help it step up its GDP growth rates to around 10% that it requires to achieve its national development goals. In this context while the present government has made improving the investment climate, or what is popularly known as ‘the ease of doing business’, and taken many steps in that directions, clearly much more has to be done. He requested the USIBC delegation to give specific suggestions on the obstacles or bureaucratic snafus their members faced when doing business in India, so that the quantum of FDI flows for the US increased substantially.
Ambassador Frank Wisner, who led the USIBC delegation said that the economic success of India is extremely important for USA and that the Indian growth rate which is at present above 7% can go up to 10%. He observed that only opening markets and driving them to competitiveness and bringing in best practices from around the world would ensure accelerated economic growth. Copies of a document titled “India’s Rise: A strategy for trade-led growth” prepared by C. Fred Bergsten of Peterson Institute for International Economics were circulated and Ambassador Frank Wisner remarked that they could only give analysis of how America looks towards India, but India must design its own package of ideas. He expressed a wish that India must join APEC and added that he had indication from Finance Minister of India that govt. of India would look at the prospect positively. He wished that India would grow better, stronger and more influential and be a global player. He said that USIBC values relationship with India Foundation and looks towards intensifying things both organizations can do together. Ambassador Teresita Schafer, Senior Advisor, McLarty Associates said that USA would certainly not throw away all trade barriers and therefore cannot ask India to throw them away. He also said that USA was trying to be friendlier to India’s exports. Mr. Kenneth I. Juster, Partner & Managing Director, Warburg Pincus said that their member companies are making investments in India in a big way. He said that they expect a greater clarity in policy making in India. He said that though FDI limit in insurance sector had increased from 26% to 49% in India, not a single US Company took advantage of it and increased its investment from 26% to 49% percent because they wanted management control of their capital which was not permissible.
Shri Ram Madhav appreciated USIBC’s desire to host an event in US if the Indian PM decides to visit US in the middle of this year. He said that India’s admission to the membership of an expanded APEC and of NSG, strengthening co-operation on solar energy front and collaboration in defence sector would go a long way in strengthening bilateral relations between India and US. F-16 manufacture in India would be a big thing to happen and Indian government would have the domestic political challenge of answering harsh criticism and clearing misinformation. He said that US must understand and appreciate India’s growing interest and ambition in Indian Ocean. He said while trade and investment is important, it is not exclusive but part of a larger vision. India has strategic goals and larger diplomatic objectives to be achieved and the present government had taken a conscious decision to move ahead on a direction which though difficult, is clearly defined.
Ambassador Ranjan Mathai emphasized the need for driving lot of technology into solar energy field and the role USA can play in this. Ambassador Ashok Kantha suggested that since global trade was flat, trailing growth in global GDP, India may not have the option to look at trade-led growth; instead it would have to rely on investment-led growth. He also suggested that USA should fast-track and facilitate the mechanism of India joining APEC. Dr Shamika Ravi, Senior Fellow, Brookings India, said that India would be able to sustain growth above 7.5% as it is laying foundational structure for growth. She also spoke of the need to rethink about the existing world order of trade and that India was open to lot of experimentation. She added that poverty eradication would have to remain the primary focus of the Indian agenda.
Sri Binod Bawri, Chairman, Bawri Group, Kolkata said that we should also look beyond GDP growth rates; programmes like Swatch Bharat would improve quality of lives of people. He also spoke of the need to focus on brining in best practices in the running of the economy. Ambassador Rajiv Sikri said that it would have to be seen whether the US Congress would approve Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). If the TPP were to come into effect, it would change the rules of the game. He said countries like India had to go through considerable sacrifices in joining WTO and now it seems that WTO+ was likely to come. He said India would have to judge the efficacy of any proposed reform measures in terms of how it would help create jobs in India. He said that India wanted more freedom with regard to movement of labour whereas for the USA, the priority was more freedom with regard to movement of capital. The two countries would have to find a balance between both so that there would be growing convergence of long term goals of both India and USA.
Shri Shaurya Doval said that when India and USA are strategic partners, an element of strategic partnership was to understand at what stage of economic evolution the other partner was. He said India’s growth had to be employment-led; ensuring job creation was a political compulsion as about a million people join workforce every month. He said India needs lot of capital to generate employment and USA needs to deploy its capital. It is a biggest opportunity to marry both. He also requested intellectual inputs from USIBC to enable India to look at and improve its own systems in order to attract capital.
Shri Shakti Sinha, Director, India Foundation who led the delegation from India Foundation presented a memento to Ambassador Frank Wisner and warmly thanked the entire delegation from USIBC for the valuable interaction and looked forward to future collaboration.
China’s Veto: Another Stab in the Back?
~ By Sudarshan Ramabadran
“The way of war is a way of deception. When able, feign inability. When deploying troops, appear not to be. When near, appear far. When far, appear near. Lure with bait; strike with chaos. If the enemy is full, be prepared. If strong, avoid him. If he is angry, disconcert him. If he is weak, stir him with pride. If he is relaxed, harry him. If his men are harmonious, split them. Attack where he is unprepared; appear where you are unexpected.” These words of Chinese master strategist Sun Tzu aptly puts into perspective how China crafts its contemporary foreign policy orientations. Henry Kissinger in his book ‘On China’ has interestingly noted that China’s diplomacy mirrors the game of ‘wei qi’, also known as go, in which players try to encircle one another. This strategy, armed with Sun Tzu’s sutras is what possibly determines China’s pursuit of its grand goal in the 21st century, which is to become the world’s No.1 power.
In 1953, the US had offered India a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council. This was flatly refused by then Prime Minister Nehru who instead suggested that the seat be offered to China because he revelled in his ‘Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai’ diplomacy not realizing that one day the Chinese guns would be up in arms against the Indian forces. In Nehru’s words, China deserved it’s so called rightful place in the UN and the Security Council, he said, “Informally, suggestions have been made by the United States that China should be taken into the United Nations but not in the Security Council and that India should take her place in the Security Council. We cannot of course accept this as it means falling out with China and it would be very unfair for a great country like China not to be in the Security Council. We have, therefore, made it clear to those who suggested this that we cannot agree to this suggestion. We have even gone a little further and said that India is not anxious to enter the Security Council at this stage, even though as a great country she ought to be there. The first step to be taken is for China to take her rightful place”, Nehru went on to add, “India because of many factors, is certainly entitled to a permanent seat in the security council. But we are not going in at the cost of China”
Ironically, India today finds itself in an unenviable position of having many of its valid security concerns vetoed by China whose relationship with Pakistan is the cause of much tension in our neighbourhood. The recent blocking of listing the dreaded Pakistani terrorist Masood Azhar, the mastermind behind the Pathankot terror attacks, from the UNSC 1267 resolution is the most recent case. India regards the implementation of this resolution as an important building block of the UN global counter terrorism strategy that aims to protect all member states and their citizens from the activities of terror groups. The Chinese veto comes as no surprise considering the role China has played in shielding Pakistan’s patronage of terrorism. This, despite the fact that since the 1990s China continues to be a victim of terrorism and separatist violence in the Xinjiang region.
However, this is not the first time China has used its veto power against India at the United Nations (UN). In the 45 years that China has been on the UN Security Council, it has used its veto power 10 times. It blocked India’s attempt to list Jamat-ud-Dawa, the terrorist organisation responsible for the 26/11 attacks 3 times. China has also blocked UNSC sanctions on Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) & Al Akhtar Trust (an organisation of the Jaish-e-Mohammed). China also refused to support the listing of Syed Salahuddin in UNSC terror list. It had also earlier blocked a move by India to seek action against Pakistan for the release from jail of LeT commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, on the ground that New Delhi has not provided sufficient information. Thus China has violated UNSC resolution 1267 several times in support of Pakistan. China’s claims that ‘Pakistan too is a victim of terrorism’ or gives frivolous reasons such as ‘insufficient information’.
To address this dangerous laxity, Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the recent Nuclear Security Summit in the US highlighted, “Let us drop the notion that terrorism is someone else’s problem and that ‘his’ terrorist is not ‘my’ terrorist”. He further added that, “The reach and supply chains of terrorism are global; but genuine cooperation between nation states is not.”
While on one hand China has continued to block India’s moves to list terrorists and terror organisation under the UNSC, drawing inspiration from ‘Wei Qi’, it has continued to engage with Pakistan on the China Pak Economic Corridor (CPEC) front as part of its ambitious One Belt One Road Initiative. China has refused to cease activities at the proposed CPEC, which runs through Gilgit Baltistan (G-B), which is Indian territory occupied by Pakistan; even according to Pakistan, G-B is disputed territory and not a part of Pakistan. China has already pledged $46 billion dollars for CPEC. Protests from the Indian side were lodged at the highest political level regarding CPEC especially the meeting hosted by Chinese President for the Pakistan Prime Minister.
However China has consistently posited CPEC as a livelihood project but has opposed Indian private companies’ oil exploration at the South China Sea, stating it is a case of sovereignty. Defending its actions, China has maintained that “We know the concern of the Indian side and those projects are not political projects. They are all for livelihood of people…We do not side with the any party on the issue of the territory. We have been advocating that the disputes should be solved through concerned parties through peaceful means. The kind of commercial activities do not affect the position of China on the claimants of the territory.”
General VP Malik, Former Army Chief in one of his columns notes the strategic inroad China aims to achieve through the proposed corridor: “If and when CPEC is completed, it will be a political, economic and strategic game changer in the region. China’s control of Shaqsgam and other valleys of Gilgit-Baltistan will enable this area to be linked with its military and industrial complexes of north-western Tibet. China also obtained a commitment from Pakistan for the security of the project and the workforce involved. The Pakistan army has raised a special security division for this, with headquarters in Diamer district of Gilgit-Baltistan. To ensure security at the Arabian Sea end, China will sell eight submarines to Pakistan, which would double its fleet.”
India – China bilateral relations remains one of the most difficult bilateral relations. One of the affecting factors has been the trust deficit. If China – India have to achieve Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s vision of INCH towards MILES (India China towards Millennium of Exceptional Synergy) then China must remain sincere and commit to its Premier Le Keqiang’s words, “China is ready to deepen counter-terrorism cooperation with India to better safeguard the development and security interests of our two countries.”
Sudarshan Ramabadran is a Research Associate with India Foundation. The views expressed are his own.
India-Bangladesh Friendship Dialogue – 7th Round
The 7th round of the India-Bangladesh Friendship Dialogue titled, “Bangladesh-India Relations: Ground Rules of a new paradigm” was held on the 4th to 5th March, 2016 in Dhaka, jointly organized by the Bangladesh Foundation and India Foundation, Friends of Bangladesh and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dhaka and witnessed high levels of participation from the political, media, executive and academic circles of both countries.
Day – 1:
The inaugural session began with the welcome remarks by H.E. Mr. Harsh Vardhan Shringla, High Commissioner of India to Bangladesh and Introductory Remarks by Mr. Satyam Roy Chowdhury, Vice President Friends of Bangladesh (India Chapter). The Dialogue was graced by the presence of the Chief Guest, Mr. Abul Hasan Mahmood Ali, M.P, Hon’ ble Foreign Minister of Bangladesh. The Key Note Speeches were delivered by H.E. Mr. Shahriar Alam, Honorable State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Bangladesh; Shri Ram Madhav, National General Secretary of BJP and Director, India Foundation.
Mr. Shahriar Alam, Hon’ble State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Bangladesh addressed the relationship between Bangladesh-India based on a multitude of commonalities–historical, cultural, linguistic, religious, ethnic and social. He highly appreciated the ratification by India of the long awaited Land Boundary Agreement that has been an epitome of goodwill of the BJP-led government towards Bangladesh. He also highlighted that apart from traditional sectors, new areas of cooperation have also opened up collaboration in nuclear energy, blue economy, maritime affairs, satellite launching just a few to name.
In his Keynote remarks, Shri Ram Madhav, National General Secretary of BJP and Director, India Foundation, mentioned that the relation of India with Bangladesh is not of a big brother but rather as partners; partners in progress, partners in peace, partners in prosperity. He emphasized on both countries’ democratic constitution and praised the Hon’ble PM, Sheikh Hasina for her stand to protect the democratic constitution of Bangladesh. In case of trade issues with India he gave his assurance that no injustice will be done to Bangladesh. He also applauded the Indian high commissioner’s involvement to take the land boundary agreement to a logical conclusion.
In his address, the Chief Guest for the Inaugural Session, Mr. Abul Hasan Mahmud Ali, Hon’ble Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bangladesh spoke about the new prospering dimensions of India-Bangladesh relations. He also mentioned that the foreign policy of both the nations should be the one which promotes secularism; human rights, social justice, and non-violent inter-cultural progress to stop religious intolerance.
Day- 2:
The 2nd Day of the event began with the much awaited Special Address by Foreign Secretary of Bangladesh, Mr. Md. Shahidul Haque. In his remarks, he emphasized on particular issues that need to be worked upon to enhance the bilateral relationship between India and Bangladesh. These issues include water, terrorism, cyber security, energy security, oil transportation, power trading, nuclear power and electricity generation.
Session – 1:
Topic: Securing Borders, Securing People
Speakers:
Chair: H.E. Shri MJ Akbar
Keynote Papers: Ms. Sripriya Ranganathan and Major General (Retd.) Abdur Rashid
In his Keynote Paper titled “Radicalization & Terrorism”, Major General (Retd.) Abdur Rashid said, radicalization is a process by which individual or group comes to adopt violent ideology as a legitimate means. Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. He raised his concern about the fact that radicalization leads to terrorism because of poverty, disparity in charity world, absence of rule of law & justice, deficit in democracy, lack of good governance, presence of social inequality and violation of human rights.
In her Keynote Address, Ms. Sripriya Ranganathan, Joint Secretary (Bangladesh & Myanmar), MEA, Government of India, talked about the good state of relationship between Bangladesh & India. She mentioned that ongoing projects like rail-road connectivity, telecom, energy, science & technology, power, culture have lead to a positive momentum, which is extended by political partnership and the coordination among the agencies of both sides.
The Panelists for the session were Capt Alok Bansal, Shri Swapan Dasgupta, Dr. Syed Manzurul Islam, Shri Swapan Dasgupta and Prof. Delwar Hossain. They discussed about the growing Radicalization and the need to develop a comprehensive Deradicalization strategy; the need for maritime boundary agreement; the need for Bangladesh to make an economic and financial relation with India; the problem of illegal currency and the issue of local security.
Session – 2:
Topic: Creating the Access of Prosperity and Growth Leverages
Speakers:
Chair: Mr. Shahriar Alam
Keynote Papers: Shri Shakti Sinha and Dr. Gowher Rizvi
The first Keynote Paper was presented by Shri Shakti Sinha, Director, South Asian Institute for Strategic Affairs, New Delhi. He stated Bangladesh could be the centre of manufacturing industries and that there are a lot of investment opportunities. He also emphasized on the need for a comprehensive water and energy framework in South Asia.
Dr. Gowher Rizvi, Foreign Affairs Adviser to the Prime Minister of Bangladesh expressed that the award of the much talked about Teesta water sharing agreement would make positive development. He stressed that harnessing the Himalayan water resources has a huge potential and remains untapped in the region especially in Nepal and Bhutan. India-Bangladesh relations are currently billed as being ‘at their best’ though there are issues of the water sharing and border management sectors. He also said that the border killings have been reduced drastically now than what it was during the BNP regime.
The panelists included Shri Binod Bawri, Director, India Foundation, Ms. Sripriya Ranganathan, Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, Dr. Qazi Khaliquzzaman Ahmed, Governing Chairman and Prof. Mustafizur Rahman, CPD Executive Director.
Session – 3:
Topic: Architecture of Connectivity: Resource, Transport and Power
Speakers:
Chair: Shri Shakti Sinha
Keynote Papers: Dr. Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury and Mrs. Veena Sikri
The Chair of the session Shri Shakti Sinha, Director, South Asian Institute for Strategic Affairs, New Delhi, stated that Bangladesh and India particularly very striving to establish connectivity. Solution beneficial for both countries and solution that is politically determinate was the main focus of this session.
The first Keynote Paper was presented by Dr. Tawfiq-e-Elahi Chowdhury, Energy Adviser to the Prime Minister of Bangladesh. He stated that, “Resources, power & transport are the architecture of connectivity between two countries”. He also spoke about challenges in power connectivity and emphasized that energy trade cooperation is the way out of energy poverty.
Smt. Veena Sikri, former Indian High Commissioner to Bangladesh, highlighted all the potentials India and Bangladesh hold in establishing connectivity but laid importance on shifting to multimodal transport-based linkages in a new paradigm shift in regional and sub-regional cooperation. She also stressed for safe financial transactions and that the region boasts huge potential in air connectivity. The Indian diplomat also suggested enhancing the connectivity between India and Bangladesh through rail to establish link under Bangladesh- Bhutan-India-Nepal (BBIN) deal. She stated “We have to look at new paradigm, we really have to move multimodal way of transportation for the shift”.
The group of panelists including Shri Prafulla Ketkar, Editor, Organiser, Capt Alok Bansal, Director, India Foundation, Mr. Munshi Faiz Ahmad and Mr. Abdul Mutlub Ahmed, President of BIISS also shared their thoughts about the future architecture of connectivity.
Valedictory Session
At the end of the two day dialogue between Bangladesh and India, the ‘Dhaka declaration’ was presented by Shri Shakti Sinha, Director, South Asian Institute for Strategic Affairs, New Delhi. He stated that the Dialogue was nurtured to answer many of the frequently asked questions and is expected to render a reality check about the future that the two countries, Bangladesh and India, may hope to be heading into.
He further added that the Dialogue has put emphasis to reinforce cooperation between Bangladesh and India in the field of maritime security, developing further shared interests in the preservation of the natural resources, improving security in the Indian Ocean and evoking the historical bonds that exist between the two countries. He was of the view that both the countries may keep the Blue Economy at the center of maritime cooperation, whereby much emphasis would be laid on seabed exploration for hydrocarbons; marine services; seafood processing and aquaculture; fishing; deep ocean water application; seaport related activities; marine renewable energies, exchange of expertise and ocean knowledge. The Dhaka Declaration recommended that Bangladesh and India may exchange, develop and improve jointly quality of literary and artistic creation; confirm and commend values of the true, the good and the beautiful, and combat anti-progress manifestations.
In the continuation of this last session along with the Dhaka Declaration the whole program was summed up with recommendations from the chief guests and panelists. The point was raised on how Bangladesh can take advantage of India as one of the largest growing economies and in turn how Bangladesh could be integral to India’s national and international security and concluded with the hope that the Dialogue will reconvene in Delhi, India, towards the end of 2016 or early 2017 for its Eighth Round to conclusively discuss three more of the identified intervention areas.
4th International Dharma-Dhamma Conference
The Centre for Study of Religion and Society (CSRS) of India Foundation is organising the 4th International Dharma-Dhamma Conference on 21-23 October, 2016. The previous editions of the Dharma-Dhamma Conference saw the participation of several hundreds of scholars from around the world.
The central theme of this year’s conference will be “Dharma and Polity”. The concept of dharma is pivotal to Asian modes of thinking and ways of living from the dawn of human civilization. In recent times there has been good deal of controversy with regard to the relation between religion and politics. The religiously pluralistic society calls for constant reinterpretation and renewal within religions to promote compatibility and complementarily between religious conceptions and social, political and economic measures. Discussions and debates will be held to imbibe the same sense upon people and political leaders of the society.
Further details will be announced shortly.
A Country Left Anguished
~ By Apurv Kumar Mishra
In the harsh winter of 1962, when Indian army was fighting Chinese aggression on battlefields higher than 14,000 feet, the Communist Part of India placed ideology over country (‘China’s Chairman is our Chairman’) and decided to support China. Prime Minister Nehru was forced to declare emergency- the first time in India- and arrest several communist leaders across the country. Among those arrested was V S Achuthanandan, then a central committee member and later the Chief Minister of Kerala.
In order to dispel the notion that communists were anti-India, Achuthanandan proposed during several weekly meetings in jail that the communists should donate blood for the jawans and donate the money collected from sale of prison rations to the defence fund of the government. Each time, the proposal was vehemently rejected and eventually things got out of hand leading to scuffles between the communists. The plan was eventually dropped but retribution was yet to come. Years later in 1965, a party worker filed a formal complaint against VS and he was held guilty of anti-party activities. The punishment? A demotion from central committee to branch level and a year-long exileto Alappuzha district Secretariat.
The story resonated when anti-India slogans were raised by a fringe group on JNU campus just as the nation was mourning the loss of Lance Naik Hanumanthappa Koppad. No civilized country, especially one which goes to extraordinary lengths to ensure free and fair trial even for terrorists like Ajmal Kasab and Yakub Memon (Supreme Court was opened at 3 am to hear his final mercy petition), can tolerate a call to destroy the country from one of its university campuses. A complaint was accordingly registered leading to investigation by the police).
All the commotion in JNU is over the fact that the police had taken into custody (not arrested) a student accused of being involved in a rally, which raised anti-India slogans. The police believes that they have enough evidence to prove his complicity while his supporters believe that he is being unjustly framed for the actions of a fringe group of students. The court will finally decide who is correct and it would have been advisable for the student community to hold back its protest till a court of law had delivered its opinion on the charges against Kanhaiya Kumar.
Throughout this debate, there has been an effort in mainstream media to portray sedition as defined in section 124A of the Indian Penal Code as an archaic colonial-era law that has no place in modern democracies. The fact is that this law in some form exists in the statute books of most countries of the world including USA and Germany. Even in Britain, where sedition law was repealed in 2009, sloganeering of the kind seen in JNU would probably result in conviction under the ‘encouragement of terrorism’ provision of Terrorism Act 2006. The country is now contemplating Extremism Disruption Orders and Banning Orders on groups that aim to undermine democracy and radicalise young people.
At the same time, courts in mature democracies have been wise enough to strike a balance between freedom of speech and seditious libel. In course of several judgments, courts have narrowed the scope of ‘sedition’ and have specified the threshold for this offence. The Indian provision on sedition has survived several attempts to challenge its constitutionality and exists today for the limited purpose of preventing acts that ‘cause disaffection towards the government established by law’ and ‘incites people to violence and to disrupt public order’. As a result of the well-defined jurisprudence on the subject, there have been an increasingly low number of convictions for the crime of sedition. In India, for example, there have been only fourteen cases of sedition in last fifteen years, of which only three have resulted in convictions- hardly the numbers befitting a ‘repressive law’.
Eventually, the debate on sedition metamorphosed into a debate on the entire JNU community and the Indian Left. It is no doubt unfair to brand an entire university ‘anti-national’ or the entire country as ‘intolerant’ based on the acts of a fringe group. However, it is a bit hypocritical for the JNU folks to talk about the freedom of speech and expression when just last year they denied Baba Ramdev the opportunity to address the 22nd International Congress of Vedanta within their campus. According to Rashmi Das, a few years back L K Advani was not allowed to step inside the campus to launch a book on Spanish grammar. Truth is, there has been, to borrow a phrase from the political philosopher Sheldon Wolin, an inverted totalitarianism of the Left in the Indian academia where ideology trumps merit, students are lulled into a narrative of grievance against all established institutions and respectability has been denied to the works of even great historians like Sir Jadunath Sarkar and R C Majumdar.
Where was the outrage when communist apparatchiks were openly circulating lists of ‘undesirables’ in educational institutions after the UPA first came to power in 2004? Who showed solidarity with Prof J S Rajput, when HRD Ministry under Arjun Singh got UNESCO to withdraw the prestigious Jan Amos Comenius award it planned to confer the former NCERT Director and the ministry instituted three frivolous departmental inquiries against him? Where were the protest marches in support of Shirin Dalvi of Urdu newspaper Avadhnama who was arrested for re-printing the Charlie Hebdo cartoons and is now forced to make ends meet by selling her jewellery?
There are certain cherished values that have been bequeathed to us for which generation upon generation of great Indians fought for. These values – independence, democracy, individual freedoms, rule of law and spirit of brotherhood among citizens – cannot be obtained by an individual but must be collectively celebrated and protected. In respect of such things, to quote Roger Scruton, the work of destruction is quick, easy and exhilarating; the work of creation slow, laborious and dull- just have a cursory look at the fate of other countries that obtained independence since 1947. The courts will eventually decide whether the slogans raised at JNU were seditious, legally speaking. However, the chanting of such slogans at an elite university in the national capital was a direct assault on the sense of nationhood and anguished a large majority of Indians who understand the difference between the severest critique of a government and a call to arms against the country itself.
Postscript:
In the 1960s, when the Indian state was fighting wars against China and Pakistan, facing a massive agrarian crisis and grappling with political instability, another powerful separatist movement led by C N Annadurai for a separate Dravid Nadu was at its peak. However in the aftermath of the 1962 war- precisely when the country’s morale was its weakest- they surprisingly gave up the demand for a separate nation. On being asked why he did not seize the moment to push his agenda, C N Annadurai said, ‘When the country is in danger, for us to advocate separatism would be to give way to the foreigner.’
Apurv Kumar Mishra is Young India Fellow (2013-14), Ashoka University. The views expressed are his own.
Counterterrorism Conference, 2016 – Architecture of Response to Global Terror Outfits
Today’s world is enormously challenged by transnational terrorist outfits including the global jihadist movement that draw their strength and sustenance from the geography and theology of their regions. It is also believed that some of them enjoy state sponsorship. Counter-terrorism, in this context, has to be operationalized by the utilization of multifaceted techniques, which would include joint intelligence between states, superior intelligence assessment skills, locating the financial flows of terrorist financing, joint operations, cyber and addressing the virtual base of terrorism, the internet, which is being increasingly used by terrorist groups.
India Foundation, in collaboration with the Government of Rajasthan organized the Counterterrorism Conference 2016 (CTC 2016) at Hotel Crowne Plaza, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 2-3 February 2016. The theme for this year’s conference was Tackling Global Terror Outfits. Over 250 eminent intellectuals, academics and scholars from India and all over the world attended the conference which was addressed by over 35 speakers. This conference brought together field operatives, senior officials from security agencies, policy makers, scholars and government leaders involved in counterterrorism operations, planning and sensitization.
The CTC 2016 emphasized on understanding the phenomenon of the mushrooming terror outfits in the Middle East and its neighbourhood, their methodology, motivation and resources. The first session explored the liaison between technology, terror and terror financing at length. The discussions also covered how the operation of these forces in tandem gives birth to the idea of “global terrorism” that transcends national borders and serves the limited interests of the terrorists.
The second workshop focused on terror infrastructure and financing. Panelists discussed in great detail the funding patterns of ISIS and Al Qaeda and the role of state actors and international banking institutions in providing financial support in some cases. This happens when a terrorist organization ingratiates itself to the people by creating a separate welfare state in a way that JeM did in Pakistan. ISIS, on the other hand, is not a self-sustaining organization. It manages its everyday expenses by supplying oil to the Middle East and beyond.
Resilient funding chains meshed with the synergy among competitive terrorist organizations working by rotational seasons of attacks makes it very important that we take the leap to think ahead of terrorists. Methods like hawala don’t involve transfer of physical money or movement but a transfer of value adding to the already resilient finance networks of terror organizations. The inherent flexibility of terror organizations and their finances debilitates monitoring mechanisms. Thus, the only solution is comprehensive cooperation and coordination. The broad spectrum of funding, however, also makes these big organizations vulnerable than the ones that are decentralized. This is where we can tap in and make a move. Smaller limited funding attacks such as the Charlie Hebdo killings pose a unique challenge where pre-paid credit cards were used to raise the money required. The fact that they have less networks makes them harder to combat.
The third workshop discussed Terror Networks- Cooperation and Rivalries. The session extensively analyzed how adversarial it is when there is cooperation among terrorist networks. It explained the transition of militant groups that work for money, individual benefits and other deeds unite together and transform into terrorist organizations when the state act against them. The ally of different terrorist organizations has raised disturbing levels of security concerns, especially over South Asia. This broad global network can be destructed by eradicating the local regimes and forces. Each state fighting terrorism should be careful in the repercussions and state must be really prepared to fight the advanced technology that aids the terrorist network.
The inaugural session was honoured with the presence of the President of India, His Excellency Shri Pranab Mukherjee. In his inaugural address he pointed out that the optimism that was achieved in the field of science and technology in the second half of last century has faded in the first 15 years of 21st century. With the rise of Al Qaeda and ISIS, non-state actors are trying to be state themselves and there is a need of fighting them at all levels of social, economic, psychological and religious aspects. The civil society, both frontier and battle ground of such ideologies, with the help of think tanks have to have comprehensive strategies to judiciously combat terrorism. In his keynote address, Dr. Abdulla Abdullah discussed how terrorism has been used to destabilize Afghanistan over the time of pre cold war, post cold war and post 9/11 attack. He reminded the fact that there is an absence of universal appreciation of the danger that terrorism possess to regional peace and security. Smt. Vasundhara Raje and Sri Suresh Prabhu added that the cost of fighting terrorism is as much as GDP of many countries and it hinders development. The threat is real, complex and sees no boundaries. Every nation needs to dismantle the frame works going behind it. Gen. V P Malik delivered the vote of thanks saying that everyone, irrespective of their background has an important role to play in countering terrorism.
The inaugural session was followed by a special dinner hosted by Shri Ajit Doval, National Security Advisor, India where Mr. Ibrahim Rahimpour (Deputy Minister for Asia & Pacific Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamic Republic of Iran) was the Guest of Honor. Mr. Rahimpour spoke against the idea of “flexible terrorism” that distinguishes between “good” and “bad” terrorists. He called upon all countries to unite for comprehensive action against terrorism. Shri Doval looked back on the last 16 years of the international fight against terrorism and said that the key lesson in this fight is to do the right thing but more importantly not do the wrong thing. Reminding that countries fighting terrorism must have both strategy and tactics, he warned against states that outsource instruments of coercion to non-state actors.
In his special lecture, Dr .S. Jaishankar expressed the importance of need of local actions to be governed by global norms. Terrorism can only be encountered by fostering international cooperation and for that, a state centered approach would allow the perpetration of terror and hold the oxygen to non-state actors. Effective interstate cooperation is required and integration is the key factor to counter terrorism. Mr. Md. Shahriar Alam, Honorable State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Government of Bangladesh was the keynote speaker at the second special lecture. He reiterated that security cooperation was the high point of the bilateral relationship between India and Bangladesh and spoke of the steps taken by Bangladesh to check terrorist activities within its borders. He also highlighted that the struggle against terrorism is ideological and counter-radicalization work is important in this regard.
In the first plenary session The Caliphate, Al Qaeda and Global Jihad and its theological underpinnings, Sri M J Akbar talked about the evolution of Caliphate and global Jihad concept. Dr. Daniel Pipes assessed the purposes of terrorist attacks which mostly are a reaction to government. The unexpected arise of Caliphate in Libya, Yemen, Nigeria and Afghanistan could lead to greater radicalization. Lt. General Ata Hussain pointed out that the real problem is the lack of information about Islam and the difference between fundamentalism and radicalism. Dr. Alexander Evans said that nations shouldn’t lose the sight of regional and rational aspects of terrorism. The 4 factors that needed to be combated now or that aid terrorism are technology, transnational alliance, multinational cooperation and innovation. He also suggested that there is need for an evidence based analysis of the process. Shri Sultan Shahin talked about the concerted efforts from the Wahabi factions to destroy the peace that Islam as a religion stands for. Through madrasas and various other modes, Quran and hadiths are misinterpreted and used for indoctrination. After listing out the main features of Jihadi ideology, he concluded by saying the importance of standing strong and tall against the attempts to tarnish the image of Islam in the world.
The second plenary session on Regional and International Response to Global Terror brought in experiences from different parts of the world in dealing with the threat of terrorism. To tackle terrorism, it is important to understand the fundamental reasons that trigger terrorist activities and then check them at the source. Targeting a single organization alone cannot yield the desired results. We have to work towards the common aim of uprooting terrorism. Multi-lateral cooperation is very important in achieving this.
The third plenary session on Global Terror and Impact on South Asia discussed how, out of the major variants of terror seen in South Asia, religious fundamentalism is the most prominent one. With most of the countries having a highly understaffed police, South Asian countries are finding it hard to tackle this menace. But South Asian countries are mostly resilient towards this threat as they are democratic and well governed. The efforts of the Sri Lankan government to defeat LTTE was discussed in detail later where it was said that fighting a just war becomes important to ensure all sections of society gets equal set of opportunities within a nation.
Valedictory session was graced by Home Minister Rajnath Singh where he spoke about how world is still grappling with a definition of terrorism, but the terrorists are gaining considerable ground during this time. In his valedictory address, H.E. Datuk NurJazlan Mohamed, Deputy Minister of Home Affairs, Malaysia spoke about how Malaysia has improved its terrorism fighting capabilities over the last few years and expressed its willingness to engage with other nations in fighting terrorism. He condemned the use of Islam as a tool to inflict violence upon people. Terrorism has got nothing to do with religion as every religion talks about peace. The session ended with Shri Kalyan Singh who talked about how terrorism is like a cancer for humanity that will destroy it if it is not controlled and the importance of increasing the peace and happiness of the world so that we can have a better future. The program concluded with Capt. Alok Bansal delivering the vote of thanks.
The photo gallery for the Counterterrorism Conference 2016 can be accessed through the given link:
https://goo.gl/photos/rX6devXre742HnKUA
Terrorism Today: Aspects, Challenges and Responses
Terrorism Today: Aspects, Challenges and Responses
Editors: Dhruv C. Katoch, Shakti Sinha
Pentagon Press
This book delves into different aspects of terrorism, as analysed by some of the most experienced global practitioners in the field of counterterrorism. Besides Indian concerns, it analyses terrorism in other parts of the world and its connections with other illegal activities, and suggests remedial measures.
To buy the book, please send a mail to mail@indiafoundation.in
Workshop on “India-Japan Partnership Towards Meeting the Challenge of Infrastructure Development in India’s Northeast”
The workshop “India-Japan Partnership towards Meeting the Challenge of Infrastructure Development in India’s Northeast” was organized on 19 – 20th January 2016 at Dimapur, Nagaland by the India Foundation and Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) with the support of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) and the Toshiba International Foundation (TIFO). The objective of this initiative was to foster meaningful policy oriented discussion between experts from both India and Japan in an area of bilateral cooperation that is relatively new but to which both governments attach a great deal of importance.
The context for this workshop was the Tokyo Declaration for Japan-India Special Strategic and Global Partnership, issued after the meeting in Tokyo on 1 September 2014, between Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which places special emphasis on Japan’s cooperation for enhanced connectivity and development in Northeast India and linking the region to other economic corridors in India and to Southeast Asia. The Joint Statement released during Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s recent visit to New Delhi has further underlined this stating – Seeking the synergy between India’s “Act East” policy and Japan’s “Partnership for Quality Infrastructure”, the two Prime Ministers decided to develop and strengthen reliable, sustainable and resilient infrastructures that augment connectivity within India and between India and other countries in the region. The two Prime Ministers pledged to advance industrial networks and regional value chains with open, fair and transparent business environment in the region.
The Inaugural Address was delivered by Hon’ble Chief Minister of Nagaland Mr. T. R. Zeliang. He pointed out that in the NER while Japan is more known for its role during the Second World War there is now a real opportunity for Japan to create a new image and memorial for itself in this region through active involvement in infrastructural development. He hoped that with the successful implementation of infrastructural projects in this region as part of India-Japan strategic partnership Japan will no more be associated with war, but with peace and development in the minds of the new generation of this region.
Notable participants included – Alok Bansal, Director, India Foundation; Rajat Kathuria, Director and CE, ICRIER; Akio Isomata, Minister Economic, Embassy of Japan in India; Ram Muivah, Secretary, North Eastern Council; Naoyuki Yoshino, Dean, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo; S. L. Meena, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region; Yasushi Ueki, Economist, ERIA; Akio Okamura, Director, Planning Division, South Asia Department, JICA; Y. Nakayama, Member, Japan Plus, DIPP, Ministry of Commerce; Prodyut Bora, Regional Expert & Commentator; M.P. Bezbaruah, Former Member, North Eastern Council; and Manoj Pant, Professor of Economics, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
The workshop discussion agenda was structured around the following themes:
- Economic Development in NER: Current Status and Potential
- Connectivity Imperatives in NER: Inter-regional, With Rest of India and Cross Border
- Areas for India-Japan Cooperation
- Public Private Partnerships: Pointers from Japan’s Involvement in the Development of SEZ’s in Myanmar
- Strategies for Enhancing India-Japan Cooperation in Infrastructure Development in NER
The participants pointed out that primarily the NER states are all subsistence agricultural economies. Agricultural production is mainly for local consumption and not much is being done in terms of value added. The number and percentage of population below poverty line in NER is declining steadily but at the same time what is worrying is that the gap with “All India” is widening.
In this context connectivity is vital to promote trade, commerce and development of this region. The necessity and importance of strengthening connectivity is:
- For NER (own development)
- For India (balanced development)
- As a catalyst of BBIN (utilizing each comparative advantage, efficient access to sea from landlocked countries/areas)
- As a gateway between India and ASEAN (connecting vast economies/markets)
Further, it was pointed out that three main areas needed to be focused on with regard to NER connectivity – transport, energy and IT with connectivity at 4 levels in each category – within each state, inter-regional, with rest of India and cross border.
Participants agreed that India-Japan cooperation in NER had immense potential in terms of the creation of the necessary infrastructure. However in order to maximize the benefits of Japan’s assistance the following points were highlighted:
- The emphasis should be on ‘quality infrastructure’ utilizing the technical skills and technological expertise from Japan.
- Infrastructure development is not sufficient to achieve effective economic growth.
- In tandem there has to be a long-term economic development plan focusing on ‘value creation’.
- The planning process must be participatory and inclusive involving multilayered consultations among all stakeholders – the Central government, the State governments, the private sector as well as the wider community.
The valedictory address was delivered by Shri Ram Madhav, National General Secretary, BJP & Director, India Foundation and the session was presided over by Shri Himanata Biswa Sarma, Member, BJP. In his address, Shri Madhav said that the development of Northeast is one of the major priorities of the ruling government. He also emphasized that Japan is a very important ally of India for the development of Northeast and the government will immensely benefit from the proposals and suggestions offered at this important workshop.
To access the photo gallery of the Workshop, please use the given link:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bxiaxlz3w08pel9Sblc2bDA0c3M&usp=sharing_eid&ts=56a5fd5f/
National Seminar on Hindu Law
Citizens of India are governed by their personal laws based on the religion they follow in the matters of marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance and maintenance. While Hindu Law arose from religious texts (dharmashastra) and customs (sadachar), several aspects of the Hindu Law were codified in the last century. For example, laws related to marriage, divorce, succession and adoption are now organised into statutes which are constantly interpreted by Indian courts.
In the 68 years since India became independent, the country has seen a remarkable transformation of its socio-economic landscape. The forces of globalisation, liberalisation and technological advancement have changed our social fabric and recalibrated our family relationships. One of the big advancements has been the greater equality for women in personal laws, especially on issues related to inheritance. There is a need to revisit important concepts of Hindu Law and examine them in the light of the changed cultural milieu today.
Centre for Constitutional and Legal Studies, India Foundation and Indian Council for Philosophical Research are jointly organizing the National Seminar on Hindu Law on 16-18 May, 2016 at New Delhi. The seminar seeks to bring together practitioners, academicians and students in the field of law to discuss various such contemporary issues and challenges in Indian Hindu Law and will also seek to initiate deliberations which mark the way ahead.
The Seminar will focus on the following four broad themes and subthemes therein:
1. Evolution of Hindu Law
2. Matrimony and Hindu Law
3. New Challenges to Hindu Law
4. Identifying and Addressing Existing Loopholes
Call for Papers – National Seminar on Hindu Law
Centre for Constitutional and Legal Studies, India Foundation and Indian Council for Philosophical Research are jointly organizing the National Seminar on Hindu Law on 16-18th May, 2016 at New Delhi. The seminar seeks to bring together practitioners, academicians and students in the field of law to discuss various such contemporary issues and challenges in Indian Hindu Law and will also seek to initiate deliberations which mark the way ahead.
Full academic papers are invited from scholars, thinkers, academics and practitioners of Hindu Law and allied discipline.
The Seminar will focus on the following four broad themes and subthemes therein:
- Evolution of Hindu Law
- Matrimony and Hindu Law
- New Challenges to Hindu Law
- Identifying and Addressing Existing Loopholes
Evolution of Hindu Law
Before we understand Hindu law in the present context, it is important to trace its evolution over several millennia. Under this theme, participants will look at the texts and traditions, schools of jurisprudence and rules of interpretation applicable to Hindu Law.
Matrimony and Hindu Law
Norms related to marriage and divorce have undergone a drastic change in our country. In this theme, we analyse matrimonial laws and related issues like adoption and custody of child in case of a divorce.
New Challenges to Hindu Law
Under this theme, the aim is to locate gender justice jurisprudence and rights of senior citizens in Hindu Law. We also evaluate the relevance of Hindu Undivided Family in the present day and age.
Identifying and Addressing Existing Loopholes
There are several practical challenges in the implementation of Hindu Law and a need to reconcile it with other personal laws of India. In this theme, we look at how Hindu Law works in multiple jurisdictions and search for a new paradigm of dispute resolution in personal law matters.
Submission Guidelines:
- Submissions are to be made in electronic form only and are to be sent mail@indiafoundation.in
- Each article must be accompanied by an abstract of not more than 300 words.
- The word limit for the papers is set at 3000 words (inclusive of footnotes).
- Articles as well as their respective abstracts must be submitted before 30th March 2016. Acceptance of articles shall be intimated within two days of receipt.
- Co–authorship is allowed (maximum of 2 authors).
- Submission must contain a covering letter indicating the name of the author(s), name of the institution, e-mail id and contact number.
- By submitting an article, the author is presumed to undertake that the article is an original work and has not been submitted, accepted or published elsewhere.
- Articles found plagiarized will be summarily rejected.
- Authors of the selected papers would be required to present at the seminar.
- In case of co-authored papers, only one author would be permitted to make the presentation.
Formatting Guidelines:
- All submissions must follow the Bluebook system of citation.
- Submissions must be in Times New Roman with font size 12 and line spacing 1.5
- Footnotes must be in Times New Roman with font size 10 and line spacing 1.
- Submissions may be made in .doc/.docx/.odt formats only.
Contact Details:
1. Guru Prakash
Research Associate
India Foundation
guruprakash88@gmail.com
+91 7838613441
2. Apurv Kumar Mishra
Research Associate, India Foundation
apurv.mishra@yifp.in
+91 8800775261
3rd International Dharma-Dhamma Conference, Indore
The 3rd International Dharma-Dhamma Conference on the theme ‘Harmony of Religions: Welfare of Humankind’ was held at the Brilliant Convention Centre in Indore from 24 October, 2015 to 26 October, 2015. This was jointly organized by the Department of Culture, Government of Madhya Pradesh; Sanchi University of Buddhist-Indic Studies (SUBIS), Bhopal and the Centre for Study of Religion and Society (CSRS) of India Foundation, New Delhi as a prelude to the Simhastha- 2016.
In this 3-Day International Conference, along with the main session, topics pertaining to Global Peace, Environment and Nature, Gender Equality, Religious Pluralism, Knowledge, Moral and Spiritual Values were discussed in different sessions. Religious gurus and noted Scholars discussed mainly on: Religion as a means of global peace, Role of religion in ecological balance, Religion promoting gender equality, Religion to safeguard human dignity, Religion to ensure social justice, Religion propagating moral and spiritual values, Religious pluralism, Development of Yogic traditions in different religions, Significance of knowledge in religion. Religious scholars from India, Southeast Asia, America and Europe presented research papers on the conference’s theme.
In his welcome speech, Hon’ble Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh, Shri Shivraj Singh Chouhan stated that through religion solution of the world’s problems is possible. He further reiterated that outcome of this conference will be received in form of nectar that may be helpful to resolve the problems of suffering humanity. He also told that government is quite determined to provide adequate space to the nations that are interested to establish their academic centres at Sanchi University of Buddhist-Indic Studies (SUBIS).
The Hon’ble Chief Guest of the ceremony and Lok Sabha Speaker Smt. Sumitra Mahajan said that Simhastha is a grand assembly of thoughts and stressed that the outcome of this conference would be helpful to us in deciding our course of life.
The Special Guest, Hon’ble Foreign Minister of Bhutan Shri Lyonpo Damcho Dorji highlighted that it is imperative to find the ways to make religion as an alternative for welfare of mankind. Praising India’s religious diversity, he said that in the world’s biggest democracy people of different religions have been living together for centuries. “India is the birthplace of the world’s four major religions — Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism — and people belonging to these religions have been living together in India for centuries.
Keynote Speaker Shri Bhaiyyaji Joshi, RSS Sarakaryavah emphasized the need of mutual cooperation and interdependency. Joshi said that one should have ‘respect’ for all religions and adopt principles of non-violence.
The inaugural session was followed by a special session chaired by Shri Banagala Upatissa Nayaka Thero, President of Mahabodhi Society (Sri Lanka). In this session Rev. Baselios Mar Thoma Paulose II, Head of Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church (Kerala) addressed the gathering and stated that he is personally against the forcible religious conversion. He considered communication is very important element for any community and put emphasis in the relevance of organization of conferences like as Dharma-Dhamma in keeping religious intolerance aside.
Eminent personalities like Swami Paramatmananda Saraswati of Arsh Vidya Mandir Rajkot, Swami Vishveshwaranand of Sanyas Ashram, Prof. Sadhvi Chaitnya Pragya from Jain Vishwa Bharati University Prof. Sun Keun Kim, Dongguk University, S. Korea H. H. Joseph Marthoma Metropolitan, Head Marthoma Sabha, Kerala and other dignitaries discussed issues related to tolerance and harmony. Swami Sukhabodhananda, Founder and Chairman, Prasanna Trust mesmerized the gathering with his interesting and thought provoking talk. He told that just our daily lives’ religion has become mechanical.
Shri Shivaraj Singh Chouhan, in his public speech, highlighted the importance of Simhastha and termed it as a grand assembly of thoughts. He stressed that along with GDP, benefits of development should be provided to common man.
Swami Avdheshanand Giri Maharaj, Acharya Mahamandaleshwar, Juna Akhara, Mr. Champika Ranawaka, State Minster of Megapolis and Western Development, Government of Sri Lanka, Prof. Geshe Ngawang Samten, Former VC, Central Tibetan University, Sarnath, Varanasi, Prof. David Frawley, Director, American Institute of Vedic Studies, USA and Shri Sultan Shahin, Founder & Editor, New Age Islam, India enlightened the audience on global peace and harmony through religion.
Mr. Oded Wiener, Advisor to the Chief Rabbinate, Israel stated that due to lack of dialogues there is chaos in the entire world. War cannot offer us solution for any problem. Rev. Sumana Siri, Buddhist Realists’ Centre, Singapore told that we can bring heaven on the planet through religion. He considered the present era as an era of digital disturbance. Prof. Vamsee Krishna Juluri, Professor of Media Studies, University of San Francisco, USA focused on the role of media in the welfare of mankind. Dr. Thich Nhat Tu, Deputy Rector, Vietnam Buddhist University, Vietnam stated that spiritual and ethical development of society is must. Dogmatic views neglect pragmatic values of other religions and it results into conflicts.
Dr. Kusum Jain, Professor (Retd.), Department of Philosophy, University of Rajasthan, Prof. Haiyan Shen, Shanghai University, China, Prof. Yasuo Kamata, Professor of Philosophy, Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan, Prof. Yajneshwar Shastri, Former Director of School of Philosophy, Psychology and Education, Gujarat University shared thoughts about unfolding richness and wisdom found in all the religions.
The Key Note speaker, world renowned spiritual Guru and founder of Art of Living Sri Sri Ravi Shankar remarked that in India social and individual welfare are never treated as different entities. There should be spiritualistic politics, secularize religion and socialize business. Spiritualise politics means that politicians and people in authority will have to have feelings for people, connection with people, a feeling of righteousness. He stated that the purpose of religion is purity in heart, clarity and quality in mind and sincerity in action. One should not keep quiet but spread the message of Dharma loud and clear in society for a one world family – ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’. Quoting from ancient Indian scriptures, he said differences of opinion and diverse ways of thinking can get one closer to ultimate reality and bring happiness and peace in the world.
Dr. Lobsang Sangay, Guest of Honour of the conference and Head of Central Tibetan Administration, Dharamshala earned the audience’ appreciation when he said that he came from the land of Manasarovar, an abode of Kailashpati Shankar. He elaborated the importance of 4C’s in life Compassion, Clarity, Co-operation and Co-existence. Hon. Sikyong began his speech by quoting H.H. the Dalai Lama, “My religion is simple. My religion is kindness” and underscored the importance of compassion as a core essence of leadership, giving a call to religious and political leaders to incorporate compassion in their official activities.